Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Antibiotic Efficacy Testing in an Ex vivo Model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms in the Cystic Fibrosis Lung
Published on: January 22, 2021
[In vitro susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates to vancomycin, teicoplanin,
Nevreste Celikbilek1, Birsen Ozdem, Feryal C Gürelik
1Ankara Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Medical Microbiology, Ankara, Turkey. nevrestec@yahoo.com
Abstract:
In this study, vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolide and daptomycin susceptibility rates of 67 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates obtained from various clinical samples between November 2006 and August 2010 in our laboratories, were investigated by E-test method and MIC values of the drugs were determined. Seventeen (25%) of the samples were from outpatient wards, 50 (75%) from inpatients of which 24 (48%) were from intensive care units. Distribution of MRSA isolated clinical samples were as follows: 16 (23.4%) blood, 28 (42.2%) wound swab, 15 (21.8%) tracheal aspirate, 2 (3.1%) urine, 2 (3.1%) urethral discharge, and one for each (1.6%) cerebrospinal fluid, joint fluid, catheter tip and nasal swab. Except one (1.5%) which was probably intermediate-resistant to vancomycin (since not confirmed by microdilution test or population analysis, this isolate was considered as "probable" intermediate-resistant), all of the isolates were found susceptible to all tested antibiotics. MIC(50) and MIC(90) values were determined as 0.75 and 1.5 µg/ml for vancomycin, 2 and 3 µg/ml for teicoplanin, 0.38 and 0.5 µg/ml for linezolide and 0.094 and 0.19 µg/ml for daptomycin, respectively. The MIC ranges were 0.25-3 µg/ml for vancomycin, 0.125-4 µg/ml for teicoplanin, 0.094-3 µg/ml for linezolide and 0.047-0.25 µg/ml for daptomycin. There was no statistically significant difference between MICs of outpatient, inpatient and intensive care unit isolates for any of the tested drugs (p> 0.05). Based on MIC90 values, daptomycin seems 4-16 times more effective than the other three drugs. It was concluded that considering their in-vitro antibacterial activity, these antibiotics can be used as alternatives to each other for the treatment of MRSA infections.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Inhibitors of Gram-positive Cell Wall Synthesis
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Development of Antibiotic Resistance
Inhibitors of Bacterial Protein Synthesis

