Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Interrelating research processes of process research.

V Shoham-Salomon¹

¹Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721.

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

|June 1, 1990

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Introduction to special section on client-therapy interaction research.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·1991

Same author

Client-treatment interaction in the study of differential change processes.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·1991

Same author

Identification of patients at risk for nonresponse and negative outcome in psychotherapy.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·1990

Same author

Paradoxical interventions: a meta-analysis.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·1987

Same author

Are schizophrenics' behaviors schizophrenic? What medically versus psychosocially oriented therapists attribute to schizophrenic persons.

Journal of abnormal psychology·1985

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

This study challenges fixed assumptions in process research, proposing a transactional framework for a more holistic understanding of change. This integrated model enhances both theory-driven and discovery-oriented research strategies.

Area of Science:

Process research
Systems theory
Organizational behavior

Background:

Current process research often assumes variables have fixed meanings and discrete contributions.
These assumptions limit understanding due to the contextual boundedness of process variables.
A decontextualized evaluation of variable worth is insufficient.

Purpose of the Study:

To question implicit assumptions in current process research.
To propose a new conceptual framework from a systemic perspective.
To integrate theory-driven and discovery-oriented research strategies.

Main Methods:

A systemic perspective is adopted.
A cyclical, ecologically oriented model is suggested.
Integration of experiments, observations, and detailed descriptions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

A transactional conception of change processes is introduced, viewing them as mutually defining.
This leads to holistic examinations of both changes of pattern and patterns of change.
The framework supports an integrated approach to research strategies.

Conclusions:

The proposed transactional core serves as a foundation for both theory-driven and discovery-oriented research.
This model encourages a more dynamic and context-aware approach to process studies.
Holistic examination of change processes is crucial for deeper insights.