Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Stages of change: A qualitative study on the implementation of a perinatal audit programme in South Africa
María Belizán1, Anne-Marie Bergh, Carolé Cilliers
1MRC Unit for Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies, University of Pretoria, Arcadia, South Africa.
Insights
Implementing the Perinatal Problem Identification Programme (PPIP) requires drivers, teamwork, outreach, feedback meetings, and strong communication. These factors are crucial for sustaining audit systems and reducing neonatal mortality.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Healthcare Management
- Quality Improvement
Background:
- Audit and feedback is a proven strategy for enhancing maternal, neonatal, and child health outcomes.
- The Perinatal Problem Identification Programme (PPIP) in South African public hospitals identifies perinatal mortality and avoidable factors.
- Understanding PPIP's implementation and sustainability is vital for improving healthcare.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the processes involved in the implementation and sustainability of the PPIP.
- To identify key factors contributing to the success of perinatal audit programs.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative exploration of clinicians' experiences through two workshop sessions.
- Utilized a six-stage, three-phase analytical framework of change (pre-implementation, implementation, institutionalization).
Main Results:
- Four critical factors for successful audit system implementation and sustainability emerged: drivers/teamwork, outreach/supervision, review/feedback meetings, and inter-level communication.
- Successful implementation involved awareness, management buy-in, preparation (software, training), data collection, and feedback.
- Institutionalization was achieved through integration into routine practice and sustained data collection.
Conclusions:
- The study provides insights into factors necessary for successful audit program implementation and maintenance.
- Findings are transferable to similar low- and middle-income settings aiming to reduce neonatal mortality (MDG 4).
- A tool for reflecting on audit program implementation and maintenance is proposed.
Background:
Audit and feedback is an established strategy for improving maternal, neonatal and child health. The Perinatal Problem Identification Programme (PPIP), implemented in South African public hospitals in the late 1990s, measures perinatal mortality rates and identifies avoidable factors associated with each death. The aim of this study was to elucidate the processes involved in the implementation and sustainability of this programme.
Methods:
Clinicians' experiences of the implementation and maintenance of PPIP were explored qualitatively in two workshop sessions. An analytical framework comprising six stages of change, divided into three phases, was used: pre-implementation (create awareness, commit to implementation); implementation (prepare to implement, implement) and institutionalisation (integrate into routine practice, sustain new practices).
Results:
Four essential factors emerged as important for the successful implementation and sustainability of an audit system throughout the different stages of change: 1) drivers (agents of change) and team work, 2) clinical outreach visits and supervisory activities, 3) institutional perinatal review and feedback meetings, and 4) communication and networking between health system levels, health care facilities and different role-players.During the pre-implementation phase high perinatal mortality rates highlighted the problem and indicated the need to implement an audit programme (stage 1). Commitment to implementing the programme was achieved by obtaining buy-in from management, administration and health care practitioners (stage 2).Preparations in the implementation phase included the procurement and installation of software and training in its use (stage 3). Implementation began with the collection of data, followed by feedback at perinatal review meetings (stage 4).The institutionalisation phase was reached when the results of the audit were integrated into routine practice (stage 5) and when data collection had been sustained for a longer period (stage 6).
Conclusion:
Insights into the factors necessary for the successful implementation and maintenance of an audit programme and the process of change involved may also be transferable to similar low- and middle-income public health settings where the reduction of the neonatal mortality rate is a key objective in reaching Millennium Development Goal 4. A tool for reflecting on the implementation and maintenance of an audit programme is also proposed.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
Development of the Oral Microbiota
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Nursing Evaluation
Section...
