Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation01:30

Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation

Self-evaluation is the process by which individuals assess their abilities, behaviors, and characteristics based on feedback from others. Charles H. Cooley observed that a person’s self-perception is primarily influenced by how others see and judge them. He suggested that individuals form their identities based on their interpretations of others' reactions. As a result, social interactions play a crucial role in shaping self-esteem and personal identity. These external evaluations often blend...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback01:24

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback

Self-esteem is intricately tied to our perception of competence and our ability to exert control over our lives. One of the primary sources of this perception is performance feedback — the ongoing evaluation of our actions in terms of success and failure. According to Franks and Marolla (1976), people derive self-worth from experiencing themselves as causal agents, capable of achieving goals and overcoming obstacles. This process nurtures a critical component of self-esteem: self-efficacy,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Field Study and Correlative Studies of Factor IX Variant FIX-R338L in Participants Treated with Fidanacogene Elaparvovec.

Thrombosis and haemostasis·2024
Same author

Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab-chemotherapy as first-line therapy for locally advanced/metastatic gastric cancer: a United States payer perspective.

Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research·2023
Same author

Use of Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Strategies by Community-Dwelling Adults to Manage Migraine: A Systematic Review.

Clinics and practice·2023
Same author

Constructing the text for the results section of a research report.

American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists·2023
Same author

Use of Melatonin and/on Ramelteon for the Treatment of Insomnia in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of clinical medicine·2022
Same author

Hemostatic efficacy of marstacimab alone or in combination with bypassing agents in hemophilia plasmas and a mouse bleeding model.

Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

Student evaluations of the portfolio process.

John E Murphy1, Tatum C Airey, Andrea M Bisso

  • 1The University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, 1295 N. Martin Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721-0202, USA. murphy@pharmacy.arizona.edu

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
|October 5, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Pharmacy students found the portfolio process offered moderate benefits, suggesting improvements like more examples and advisor time. This process aims to develop crucial self-assessment skills for their pharmacy careers.

Keywords:
assessmentexpected outcomesportfolioquestionnairesurvey

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacy Education
  • Professional Development

Background:

  • The portfolio process is integral to pharmacy education.
  • It aims to enhance students' understanding of learning outcomes and competency attainment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Evaluate pharmacy students' perceived benefits of the portfolio process.
  • Gather student suggestions for improving the portfolio process.

Main Methods:

  • A questionnaire was administered to 250 pharmacy students (first-, second-, and third-year).
  • Data collected from students at the University of Arizona College of Pharmacy.

Main Results:

  • Students perceived the portfolio process as having less than moderate benefit.
  • First-year students requested more portfolio examples.
  • Second- and third-year students desired more advisor interaction.

Conclusions:

  • The portfolio process requires ongoing refinement to improve student perceptions.
  • Enhancements aim to foster self-assessment skills essential for lifelong learning in pharmacy.
  • The process is intended to support the development of knowledge and professional skills throughout pharmacy careers.