Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

12:04
Human Neuroendocrine Tumor Cell Lines as a Three-Dimensional Model for the Study of Human Neuroendocrine Tumor Therapy
Published on: August 14, 2012
Neuroendocrine tumor presenting like lymphoma: a case report
Riccardo Del Vescovo1, Roberto Luigi Cazzato, Sofia Battisti
1Department of Radiology, Campus Bio-Medico, University of Rome, Italy. r.delvescovo@unicampus.it.
Journal of Medical Case Reports
|October 7, 2011
Summary
Neuroendocrine tumors are rare malignancies. This case highlights that neuroendocrine tumors should be considered in the differential diagnosis of middle-posterior mediastinal masses and liver lesions, even when they mimic lymphoma on imaging.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Radiology
- Pathology
Background:
- Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a rare and diverse group of malignancies.
- These tumors can arise in various organ systems, including the mediastinum.
- Mediastinal masses present a diagnostic challenge, with differential diagnoses including lymphoma, cysts, and metastatic disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a case of a middle-posterior mediastinal neuroendocrine tumor with liver metastases.
- To emphasize the importance of considering NETs in the differential diagnosis of mediastinal masses and liver lesions.
- To illustrate how NETs can mimic other conditions, such as lymphoma, on imaging.
Main Methods:
- Case report of a 42-year-old Caucasian male.
- Diagnostic workup included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
- Histopathological confirmation of neuroendocrine tumor.
Main Results:
- The patient presented with a middle-posterior mediastinal mass and liver metastases.
- Initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suggested lymphoma.
- Diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor was confirmed.
Conclusions:
- Neuroendocrine tumors should be included in the differential diagnosis of mediastinal masses.
- Liver lesions in conjunction with mediastinal masses warrant consideration of neuroendocrine tumors.
- Radiological findings can sometimes be misleading, necessitating a broad differential diagnosis.