Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

07:47
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
Published on: January 9, 2016
Differences in delay discounting between smokers and nonsmokers remain when both rewards are delayed
Suzanne H Mitchell1, Vanessa B Wilson
1Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, L470, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA. mitchesu@ohsu.edu
Psychopharmacology
|October 11, 2011
Summary
Smokers show greater delay discounting than nonsmokers, especially for immediate rewards. This difference persists even when rewards are slightly delayed, but less so for real rewards and varies by gender.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral economics
- Neuroscience of addiction
- Psychology of decision-making
Background:
- Smokers exhibit heightened delay discounting, preferring smaller, immediate rewards over larger, delayed ones more than nonsmokers.
- This suggests smokers devalue future rewards more significantly than the general population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if the observed group difference in delay discounting is solely due to smokers overvaluing immediate rewards.
- To investigate if the smoker-nonsmoker difference in reward valuation persists when both reward options are delayed.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments were conducted comparing smokers and nonsmokers.
- Participants made choices between immediate/soon and delayed rewards, using both real and hypothetical monetary incentives.
Main Results:
- Hyperbolic and double exponential models confirmed smokers discount delayed rewards more than nonsmokers, particularly when one option is immediate.
- The discounting difference between smokers and nonsmokers was observed even with a slight delay, notably in male smokers.
- This smoker-nonsmoker difference diminished significantly for potentially real rewards when the smaller reward was delayed.
Conclusions:
- The tendency for smokers to discount delayed rewards is not limited to scenarios with immediate options.
- Factors such as reward type (real vs. hypothetical) and gender significantly influence the relationship between smoking and delay discounting.
- Understanding these nuances is crucial for developing targeted interventions for smoking cessation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Reinforcement Schedules
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
Once a behavior is learned,...

