Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A guide to interpreting contraceptive efficacy studies.

J Trussell1, R A Hatcher, W Cates

  • 1Office of Population Research, Princeton University, New Jersey.

Obstetrics and Gynecology
|September 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reporting of Accidents from Local Anesthetics.

The Dental register·2021
Same author

Foam stability in filtered lubricants containing antifoams.

Journal of colloid and interface science·2020
Same author

Response to "study of contraceptive mobile app fails to provide convincing findings".

Contraception·2018
Same author

Evaporation-induced foam stabilization in lubricating oils.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2018
Same author

Clarifications concerning contraceptive mobile app Pearl Index calculations.

Contraception·2018
Same author

The Life History of Ascaris Lumbricoides.

The Indian medical gazette·2017
Same journal

The Political Determinants of Obstetric Prescribing.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk of Adverse Maternal Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Milestones in Motion: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Ebola Virus in Pregnancy.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

A Quality-Improvement Study Evaluating Three Postpartum Prophylactic Oxytocin Rates and Blood Loss After Vaginal Birth.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

The Effects of Climate Change on Obstetric and Gynecologic Health.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
See all related articles

Published contraceptive efficacy trials often contain design and reporting flaws, making it difficult for clinicians to compare birth control methods. This analysis highlights these issues and offers recommendations for improved future studies.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Health
  • Clinical Trial Methodology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Published efficacy trials for birth control methods and contraceptive products may present misleading data.
  • Inconsistent trial designs, performance, and reporting obscure true contraceptive efficacy.
  • This hinders family planning clinicians' ability to make valid comparisons between different contraceptive options.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review definitions and measures used for assessing contraceptive efficacy.
  • To identify and illustrate common flaws in published contraceptive efficacy trials.
  • To provide recommendations for improving future contraceptive efficacy studies.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of published efficacy trials for various birth control methods.
Keywords:
AmericasComparative StudiesContraceptionContraception FailureContraceptive EffectivenessContraceptive UsageCritiqueDeveloped CountriesFamily PlanningNorth AmericaNorthern AmericaResearch MethodologyStudiesUnited StatesUse-effectivenessWorld

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of definitions and measurement techniques for contraceptive efficacy.
  • Identification of design, performance, and reporting fallacies in existing studies.

    • Main Results:

    • Numerous fallacies were found in the design, performance, and reporting of published contraceptive efficacy trials.
    • These flaws make valid comparisons among contraceptive methods virtually impossible for clinicians.
    • A summary table of comparative failure rates for all contraception methods is included.

    Conclusions:

    • Current contraceptive efficacy trials are often methodologically flawed, leading to potentially misleading results.
    • Standardized and improved trial methodologies are crucial for accurate contraceptive product comparison.
    • Recommendations are provided to enhance the reliability and interpretability of future contraceptive efficacy research.