Related Experiment Videos
[Poly-, multiple trauma and intra-abdominal injuries]
H Roscheck1, K Marohl, H Freitag
1Abteilung für Chirurgie, Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhauses Koblenz.
Insights
Polytraumatized patients with abdominal injuries face high mortality, especially older adults and females. Ultrasonography is preferred over peritoneal lavage for diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Trauma Surgery
- Emergency Medicine
- Surgical Diagnostics
Context:
- Polytraumatized patients present complex challenges in emergency care.
- Abdominal injuries are a significant concern in multi-trauma cases.
- Understanding injury patterns and mortality factors is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose:
- To analyze mortality rates and causes associated with abdominal injuries in polytraumatized patients.
- To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of diagnostic methods including computed tomography, peritoneal lavage, and ultrasonography.
- To identify demographic factors influencing mortality in this patient cohort.
Summary:
- A retrospective study of 530 polytraumatized patients revealed that 193 had abdominal injuries, with a 26% mortality rate in this subgroup.
- Mortality risk increased significantly with co-existing extra-abdominal injuries.
- Common causes of death included hemorrhage shock and head injuries; age and sex were identified as critical factors.
Impact:
- Diagnostic imaging choices impact patient outcomes, with ultrasonography favored over peritoneal lavage.
- The findings highlight the need for tailored management strategies for polytraumatized patients with abdominal injuries.
- This research informs clinical practice regarding diagnostic tool selection and risk assessment in trauma care.
Abstract:
The present work deals with the problem of abdominal injuries in polytraumatized patients. The results were obtained from a retrospective study of the records of 530 polytraumatized patients treated at the Central Hospital of the German Federal Armed Forces (Bundeswehr). In all, 193 of these patients had abdominal injuries. The overall mortality was 23.8% (n = 126): mortality among the patients with abdominal injuries was 26% (n = 50). Abdominal injuries alone led to death in 9.1% (n = 1), but mortality increased to 18.4% when at least one extra-abdominal injuries was also present. A combination of abdominal injuries and two or more extra-abdominal lesion led to a mortality rate of 27%. Mortality was found to be age- and sex-related: in young children and patients over 55 years (especially those around 70) mortality was 33.3%-72%. Among the cases with fatal outcome there was a female-to-male ratio of 3:2. The most common causes of death were: hemorrhage shock (62.3%), head injuries (37.7%), septicemia (8.1%), pneumonia, and ARDS (5.4% each). Within the last eight years we have used the following supplementary examination methods: computed tomography, peritoneal lavage, and ultrasonography. The retrospective study has shown that CT is not the examination of choice. The reliability with lavage and ultrasonography was approximately the same, but lavage was found to be more dangerous. Therefore, we abandoned lavage and used sonography only. However, we are of the opinion that any surgeon should use the examination method that has yielded the best results for him or her, to ensure the best possible outcome for the patient.