Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2
Published on: September 18, 2021
Normalization, testing, and false discovery rate estimation for RNA-sequencing data
Jun Li1, Daniela M Witten, Iain M Johnstone
1Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. junli07@stanford.edu
Abstract:
We discuss the identification of genes that are associated with an outcome in RNA sequencing and other sequence-based comparative genomic experiments. RNA-sequencing data take the form of counts, so models based on the Gaussian distribution are unsuitable. Moreover, normalization is challenging because different sequencing experiments may generate quite different total numbers of reads. To overcome these difficulties, we use a log-linear model with a new approach to normalization. We derive a novel procedure to estimate the false discovery rate (FDR). Our method can be applied to data with quantitative, two-class, or multiple-class outcomes, and the computation is fast even for large data sets. We study the accuracy of our approaches for significance calculation and FDR estimation, and we demonstrate that our method has potential advantages over existing methods that are based on a Poisson or negative binomial model. In summary, this work provides a pipeline for the significance analysis of sequencing data.
Related Concept Videos
RNA-seq
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while microarray-based...
Real Time RT-PCR
The real-time quantification of the number of amplified products is...
Ribosome Profiling
Applications of ribosome profiling
Ribosome profiling has many applications, including in vivo monitoring of translation inside a particular organ or tissue type and quantifying new protein synthesis levels.
The technique helps...

