Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
In-group ratings are affected by who asks and how: interactive effects of experimenter group-membership and response
Fredrik Björklund1, Martin Bäckstrom, Øyvind Jørgensen
1Department of Psychology, Lund University, Sweden. Fredrik.Bjorklund@psychology.lu.se
Abstract:
In three experiments, participants rated how well a number of adjectives described their in-group (e.g. kind-hearted, helpful, intelligent, efficient, etc.). In Experiment 1, females were found to rate their ingroup (females) more favorably when reporting verbally to female (rather than male) experimenters. This finding was further explored in two subsequent experiments where response format (written vs. verbal) was also manipulated. Both experiments revealed an interaction such that ethnic Swedes rated their in-group (Swedes) the most favorably when reporting verbally to an in-group experimenter and the least favorably when reporting verbally to a Middle Eastern experimenter. Results are discussed in relation to correction and contextual activation of social norms.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
In- and Out-Groups
Social Proof
Group Design
Impact of Groups on Groups
Conformity
Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity

