Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
A bootstrap test for comparing two variances: simulation of size and power in small samples
Jiajing Sun1, Michael R Chernick, Robert A LaBudde
1Economics Research Group Management School, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom. sunjiajing@hotmail.com
This study surprisingly found that bootstrap tests using the F statistic maintain accurate test sizes for comparing variances across various distributions, even with small sample sizes. These bootstrap methods also demonstrate reasonable power for testing variance equivalence.
Area of Science:
- Statistics
- Statistical Inference
- Computational Statistics
Background:
- The F statistic, proposed by Good and Chernick (1993), is used for testing the equality of variances between two independent groups via bootstrapping.
- Previous research indicated that bootstrap confidence intervals for variances exhibit reduced coverage for skewed distributions (e.g., chi-squared, log-normal).
- Similar issues were anticipated for tests involving the ratio of variances, a common application of the F statistic in bootstrapping.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of various bootstrap tests employing the F statistic.
- To determine if these tests maintain nominal size across diverse population distributions with small sample sizes.
- To assess the power of bootstrap tests for detecting differences in variances.
Main Methods:
- Simulated the performance of bootstrap F statistic tests for variance equality.
- Utilized various population distributions: gamma(2,3), uniform(0,1), Student's t (10 df), normal(0,1), and log-normal(0,1).
- Compared test sizes against asymptotic values and conducted power comparisons.
Main Results:
- Surprisingly, all tested bootstrap F statistic methods maintained valid test sizes, closely approximating asymptotic values across all simulated distributions.
- The bootstrap tests demonstrated reasonable power in detecting differences when testing for variance equivalence.
- Results were consistent despite known issues with bootstrap confidence intervals for skewed distributions.
Conclusions:
- Bootstrap tests utilizing the F statistic are robust in maintaining nominal size, even for non-normal and skewed distributions with small sample sizes.
- These methods offer a viable and powerful approach for testing the equality of variances between two independent groups.
- The findings challenge prior expectations regarding bootstrap performance with skewed data for variance ratio tests.
Related Concept Videos
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Bootstrapping
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Significance Testing: Overview
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

