The 'Twinkie Defense': the relationship between carbonated non-diet soft drinks and violence perpetration among Boston high school students
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli
Published on: August 12, 2016
Sara J Solnick1, David Hemenway
1Department of Economics, University of Vermont, 94 University Place, Burlington, VT 05405, USA. sara.solnick@uvm.edu
Objectives:
To investigate the association of carbonated non-diet soft drink consumption and violence perpetration in a sample of Boston adolescents.
Methods:
In a survey of Boston public high schools, respondents were asked how often they drank non-diet soft drinks and whether they had carried a weapon or engaged in physical violence with a peer. Regression analysis was used to determine the role of soft drink consumption in these behaviours.
Results:
Adolescents who drank more than five cans of soft drinks per week (nearly 30% of the sample) were significantly more likely to have carried a weapon and to have been violent with peers, family members and dates (p<0.01 for carrying a weapon and p<0.001 for the three violence measures). Frequent soft drink consumption was associated with a 9-15% point increase in the probability of engaging in aggressive actions, even after controlling for gender, age, race, body mass index, typical sleep patterns, tobacco use, alcohol use and having family dinners.
Conclusions:
There was a significant and strong association between soft drinks and violence. There may be a direct cause-and-effect relationship, perhaps due to the sugar or caffeine content of soft drinks, or there may be other factors, unaccounted for in our analyses, that cause both high soft drink consumption and aggression.
Related Concept Videos
Cause and Effect
Conduct Disorder
Aggression
Bullying
Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation
Bystander Effect
