Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
Role of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treating HIV-infected children
Martina Penazzato1, Carlo Giaquinto
1Department of Paediatrics, University of Padua, Italy.
Insights
First-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) like efavirenz and nevirapine are vital for pediatric HIV treatment. Newer NNRTIs offer improved resistance profiles, addressing limitations of older drugs in children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric infectious diseases
- Antiretroviral therapy
- HIV/AIDS research
Background:
- First-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), efavirenz and nevirapine, are crucial in pediatric HIV management, from preventing mother-to-child transmission to lifelong treatment.
- These agents offer efficacy, safety, and regimen simplicity, making them accessible in various settings.
- While generally effective, rapid resistance development can limit treatment options, especially in resource-limited areas.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the role of efavirenz and nevirapine in pediatric antiretroviral therapy.
- To outline clinical data on newer NNRTIs, etravirine and rilpivirine, for pediatric use.
- To assess how newer NNRTIs can overcome limitations of first-generation NNRTIs in children.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature and clinical trial data on NNRTIs in pediatric HIV treatment.
- Analysis of efficacy, safety, tolerability, and resistance patterns of efavirenz, nevirapine, etravirine, and rilpivirine in pediatric populations.
- Comparison of outcomes between NNRTIs and other antiretroviral classes in children.
Main Results:
- First-generation NNRTIs show comparable outcomes to protease inhibitors in children, but resistance can be a significant issue.
- Infants under 36 months in resource-limited settings showed higher treatment failure rates with nevirapine-based regimens compared to lopinavir/ritonavir.
- Newer NNRTIs like etravirine and rilpivirine demonstrate potential benefits, including higher genetic barriers to resistance and improved tolerability, though pediatric data is still emerging.
Conclusions:
- Efavirenz and nevirapine remain important for pediatric HIV therapy, but resistance necessitates alternative options.
- Etravirine and rilpivirine show promise for pediatric use, potentially offering better resistance profiles and tolerability.
- Further research and ongoing trials are essential to establish the role of newer NNRTIs in comprehensive pediatric HIV treatment strategies.
Abstract:
The first-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), efavirenz and nevirapine, fulfil key roles in antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected paediatric patients, from lowering the incidence of mother-to-child transmission during pregnancy and birth to treatment throughout childhood and adolescence. Both agents have established efficacy, safety and tolerability profiles, and also offer advantages over other classes of therapy in terms of regimen simplicity and availability across different treatment settings. Although the role of NNRTIs in paediatric treatment strategies is largely determined by experience in adult patients, results of the recent phase II/III PENPACT-1 trial in infants and children aged between 30 days and 18 years have shown that there are no significant differences in 4-year virological, immunological or clinical outcomes between NNRTIs and protease inhibitors as first- and second-line agents. However, results from the IMPAACT P1060 study (cohort 2), conducted in resource-limited settings, showed that infants under 36 months unexposed to NNRTIs were significantly more likely to fail treatment when started on a nevirapine-based regimen than those on a lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen. Unfortunately, the use of efavirenz and nevirapine in children can be limited by rapid development of high-level resistance to one or both agents, which may reduce the availability of viable treatment options, particularly in resource-limited settings. Several therapeutic strategies addressing this issue are currently under investigation, but a significant need for new NNRTI-based treatment options remains. The more recently approved NNRTI, etravirine, has demonstrated efficacy and safety benefits in HIV-1-infected, NNRTI-resistant adult patients, with a higher genetic barrier to the development of resistance relative to the first-generation NNRTIs. Another NNRTI, rilpivirine (TMC278), is approved for use in HIV-1-infected, treatment-naïve adult patients and has demonstrated an improved tolerability profile compared with efavirenz. Although available data on etravirine in children are currently limited, ongoing trials will provide important information on the potential for their use in novel paediatric treatment strategies. This review examines the role of efavirenz and nevirapine in paediatric antiretroviral therapy in children within different treatment settings. In addition, this review also outlines available clinical data on etravirine and rilpivirine in the context of how these antiretrovirals may address some of the limitations of efavirenz and nevirapine in paediatric patients.
Related Concept Videos
Antiviral Nucleoside Inhibitors
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Inhibitors of Viral Protein Synthesis
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease
Inhibitors of Virion Maturation and Assembly
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion

