Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Role of Ephrin-Eph Signalling in Intestinal Stem Cell Renewal01:22

Role of Ephrin-Eph Signalling in Intestinal Stem Cell Renewal

Erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular carcinoma receptor (Eph) and its ligand, Eph receptor-interacting protein (Ephrin) were first discovered in the human carcinoma cell line, hence the name. Ephrin-Eph interaction guides cells to reach their appropriate location in adult tissues. They also play an essential role in the immune system by helping in immune cell migration, adhesion, and activation. Based on their structure and function, Eph is divided into two classes — EphA and EphB.
The JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway01:20

The JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway

Several cytokine receptors have tightly bound Janus kinase or JAK proteins attached at their cytosolic tail. Small signaling molecules such as cytokines, growth hormones, or prolactins bind to the cytokine receptors and initiate their dimerization. The dimerization brings the cytosolic JAKs together that trans-phosphorylate and activates each other. The activated JAKs now phosphorylate cytosolic tails of the cytokine receptors, which serve as binding sites for adaptor proteins such as  SH2...
Amplifying Signals via Enzymatic Cascade01:22

Amplifying Signals via Enzymatic Cascade

When a ligand binds to a cell-surface receptor, the receptor's intracellular domain changes shape, which may either activate its enzyme function or allow its binding to other molecules. The initial signal is amplified by most signal transduction pathways. This means that a single ligand molecule can activate multiple molecules of a downstream target. Proteins that relay a signal are most commonly phosphorylated at one or more sites, activating or inactivating the protein. Kinases catalyze the...
Assembly of Signaling Complexes01:30

Assembly of Signaling Complexes

Multiprotein signaling complexes are formed in a dynamic process involving protein-protein interactions at the cytoplasmic domain of transmembrane receptors or enzymatic and non-enzymatic proteins associated with the receptor. These complexes ensure the activation and propagation of intracellular signals that regulate cell functions.
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
Hedgehog Signaling Pathway02:33

Hedgehog Signaling Pathway

The Hedgehog gene (Hh) was first discovered due to its control of the growth of disorganized, hair-like bristles phenotype in Drosophila, much like hedgehog spines. Hh plays a crucial role in the development of organs and the maintenance of homeostasis in both invertebrates and vertebrates. However, while Drosophila has only one Hh protein, mammals have multiple functional Hedgehog proteins - Sonic (Shh), Desert (Dhh), and Indian Hedgehog (Ihh). All of these homologous proteins have adapted to...
Receptor Tyrosine Kinases01:26

Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Receptor tyrosine kinases or RTKs are membrane-bound receptors that phosphorylate specific tyrosine on protein substrates. RTKs regulate cellular growth, differentiation, survival, and migration. They contain an extracellular ligand binding domain, a transmembrane domain, and a cytosolic tail with intrinsic kinase activity. Several extracellular signaling molecules activate RTKs in one or more ways and relay the signal downstream. Ligands such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Proliferation associated 2G4 is required for the ciliation of vertebrate motile cilia.

Communications biology·2024
Same author

Polyethyleneimine/polyethylene glycol-conjugated gold nanoparticles as nanoscale positive/negative controls in nanotoxicology: testing in frog embryo teratogenesis assay-<i>Xenopus</i> and mammalian tissue culture system.

Nanotoxicology·2023
Same author

Wnt4 and ephrinB2 instruct apical constriction via Dishevelled and non-canonical signaling.

Nature communications·2023
Same author

Male infertility-associated Ccdc108 regulates multiciliogenesis via the intraflagellar transport machinery.

EMBO reports·2022
Same author

Zic5 stabilizes Gli3 via a non-transcriptional mechanism during retinal development.

Cell reports·2022
Same author

CEP97 phosphorylation by Dyrk1a is critical for centriole separation during multiciliogenesis.

The Journal of cell biology·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

Co-immunoprecipitation Assay for Studying Functional Interactions Between Receptors and Enzymes
09:40

Co-immunoprecipitation Assay for Studying Functional Interactions Between Receptors and Enzymes

Published on: September 28, 2018

Non-SH2/PDZ reverse signaling by ephrins.

Ira O Daar1

  • 1Laboratory of Cell & Developmental Signaling, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, MD 21702, USA. daar@ncifcrf.gov

Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology
|November 2, 2011
PubMed
Summary

This review explores how ephrins, which are part of the Eph/ephrin signaling system, can reverse signal through their own intracellular domains. The focus is on mechanisms that do not rely on SH2 or PDZ interactions. These pathways may regulate cell adhesion and movement, influencing tissue architecture and morphogenesis. The authors synthesize evidence from the literature to suggest that ephrins can act independently of traditional signaling routes. The findings highlight the importance of non-SH2/PDZ signaling in understanding how ephrins function. The study does not propose new mechanisms but summarizes existing research to clarify how ephrins may influence cell behavior. The implications suggest that further study of these pathways is needed to fully understand their role in development and disease.

Keywords:
Ephrin signalingReverse signaling pathwaysCell adhesion mechanismsTissue morphogenesis

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Assessing Cellular Target Engagement by SHP2 (PTPN11) Phosphatase Inhibitors
08:45

Assessing Cellular Target Engagement by SHP2 (PTPN11) Phosphatase Inhibitors

Published on: July 17, 2020

Quantitative PCR-based Assay to Measure Sonic Hedgehog Signaling in Cellular Model of Ciliogenesis
07:26

Quantitative PCR-based Assay to Measure Sonic Hedgehog Signaling in Cellular Model of Ciliogenesis

Published on: January 31, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

Co-immunoprecipitation Assay for Studying Functional Interactions Between Receptors and Enzymes
09:40

Co-immunoprecipitation Assay for Studying Functional Interactions Between Receptors and Enzymes

Published on: September 28, 2018

Assessing Cellular Target Engagement by SHP2 (PTPN11) Phosphatase Inhibitors
08:45

Assessing Cellular Target Engagement by SHP2 (PTPN11) Phosphatase Inhibitors

Published on: July 17, 2020

Quantitative PCR-based Assay to Measure Sonic Hedgehog Signaling in Cellular Model of Ciliogenesis
07:26

Quantitative PCR-based Assay to Measure Sonic Hedgehog Signaling in Cellular Model of Ciliogenesis

Published on: January 31, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Cell signaling pathways in developmental biology
  • Molecular mechanisms of cell adhesion
  • Cancer biology and metastasis signaling

Background:

Eph/ephrin signaling influences cell adhesion and movement, yet the exact mechanisms remain unclear. Prior research has shown that these pathways regulate tissue separation and morphogenesis. However, how ephrins reverse signal through their intracellular domains is not fully understood. This gap motivated further investigation into signaling modes beyond SH2 and PDZ interactions. No prior work had resolved the role of non-SH2/PDZ mechanisms in ephrin signaling. The de-regulation of these pathways is linked to aggressive tumors. This uncertainty drove the authors to analyze reverse signaling mechanisms. The focus is on how ephrins influence cell behavior without relying on SH2 or PDZ domains.

Purpose Of The Study:

This review aims to clarify how ephrins reverse signal through their intracellular domains. The specific problem is understanding signaling modes independent of SH2 and PDZ interactions. The motivation stems from gaps in how these mechanisms regulate cell adhesion and movement. The authors propose to synthesize literature on non-SH2/PDZ signaling. This approach allows for a focused analysis of ephrin signaling. The study does not aim to propose new mechanisms but to summarize existing evidence. The goal is to highlight mechanisms that function without SH2 or PDZ domains. This focus aligns with the need to understand alternative signaling routes.

Main Methods:

The authors conducted a literature review to analyze ephrin reverse signaling. They focused on studies where ephrins signal through their intracellular domains. The approach excluded mechanisms involving SH2 or PDZ domains. The review synthesized findings from multiple studies on cell adhesion and movement. The analysis centered on reverse signaling pathways. The authors did not perform new experiments but compiled existing data. The method involved comparing how ephrins function in different contexts. The synthesis emphasized signaling modes independent of SH2 and PDZ interactions.

Main Results:

Ephrins can reverse signal through their intracellular domains without SH2 or PDZ interactions. This mechanism affects cell adhesion and movement independently of forward signaling. The strongest finding is that ephrins influence tissue architecture through non-SH2/PDZ pathways. The authors report that these mechanisms are distinct from traditional signaling routes. The data suggest that ephrin signaling may regulate morphogenesis through alternative domains. The review highlights that these pathways are not fully understood. The evidence shows that ephrins can act without relying on SH2 or PDZ domains. The findings support the idea that reverse signaling is a key regulatory mechanism.

Conclusions:

The authors synthesize evidence that ephrins reverse signal through their intracellular domains. These mechanisms operate independently of SH2 and PDZ interactions. The findings suggest that ephrins may influence cell adhesion and movement through alternative pathways. The review does not propose new mechanisms but summarizes existing literature. The authors highlight that these pathways are distinct from traditional signaling routes. The evidence supports the idea that reverse signaling is a key regulatory mechanism. The authors do not claim that SH2 or PDZ interactions are unnecessary. The synthesis implies that non-SH2/PDZ signaling is an important area for further study.

The study suggests that ephrins may reverse signal through their intracellular domains without relying on SH2 or PDZ interactions.

The authors propose that non-SH2/PDZ signaling may regulate cell adhesion and movement independently of traditional domains.

The study suggests that ephrins may affect cell adhesion and movement through intracellular domains that do not involve SH2 or PDZ interactions.

The authors suggest that reverse signaling through ephrins may regulate tissue separation and morphogenesis independently of SH2 or PDZ domains.

The study does not claim that SH2 and PDZ interactions are essential for ephrin signaling.

The authors suggest that non-SH2/PDZ signaling is an important area for further study in Eph/ephrin signaling.