Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Torts I01:14

Torts I

Torts in nursing are wrongful acts that can harm patients and potentially lead to civil liability for the involved nurse. These wrongful acts range from unintentional errors to deliberate actions. Depending on the nature and severity of the tort, a nurse found liable may face financial penalties or disciplinary actions. Understanding the distinctions between intentional, quasi-intentional, and unintentional torts is crucial for nurses to mitigate risks and provide safe patient care.
Intentional...
Torts III01:26

Torts III

Types of Quasi-intentional Torts in Healthcare
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Torts II01:13

Torts II

Intentional torts in healthcare refer to deliberate actions that cause harm or infringe on the rights of others. Understanding these torts is crucial for healthcare professionals to avoid legal liabilities and maintain ethical standards in patient care.
Standards of Care II01:19

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:
Standards of Care I01:22

Standards of Care I

Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II01:23

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II

Establishing a secure, collaborative nurse-patient relationship is crucial for delivering high-quality care. This relationship, founded on trust, respect, and honesty, enhances the patient's comfort and willingness to share vital health information. For example, a nurse who listens actively and without judgment provides clear information about health conditions and treatment options and respects patient decisions, which builds a trusting relationship.
Communication between nurses and patients...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Programs for responding after patients are harmed by their healthcare: A Making Healthcare Safer IV rapid review.

Journal of patient safety and risk management·2026
Same author

Advertising in AI-Powered Clinical Decision Support Tools.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Ethical Assessment of Generative AI Tools for Clinical Summarization Tasks.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

Utah's Experiment With AI-Driven Prescription Renewals.

JAMA health forum·2026
Same author

An Observational Study of Disparities in Voluntary Event Reporting in a Large Academic Health System.

Journal of patient safety·2026
Same author

Stakeholder views about the responsibilities of principal investigators in multicenter randomized controlled trials.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Understanding medical malpractice insurance: a primer.

The Synthesis project. Research synthesis report·2011
Same journal

How will employers respond to coverage reforms.

The Synthesis project. Research synthesis report·2011
Same journal

Geographic variation in medicare per capita spending.

The Synthesis project. Research synthesis report·2011
Same journal

Cost-sharing: effects on spending and outcomes.

The Synthesis project. Research synthesis report·2011
Same journal

Public program crowd-out of private coverage.

The Synthesis project. Research synthesis report·2011
Same journal

Care management of patients with complex health care needs.

The Synthesis project. Research synthesis report·2011
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

Magnetically-Assisted Remote Controlled Microcatheter Tip Deflection under Magnetic Resonance Imaging
11:27

Magnetically-Assisted Remote Controlled Microcatheter Tip Deflection under Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: April 4, 2013

Medical malpractice - april 2011 update.

Michelle M Mello1, Allen Kachalia, Sarah Goodell

  • 1Harvard School of Public Health.

The Synthesis Project. Research Synthesis Report
|November 5, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Medical malpractice reforms, particularly caps on noneconomic damages, show limited impact on liability costs and defensive medicine. These reforms may reduce health spending, but evidence on innovative approaches remains weak.

More Related Videos

Maintenance of a Lateral Fluid Percussion Injury Device
05:16

Maintenance of a Lateral Fluid Percussion Injury Device

Published on: April 21, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

Magnetically-Assisted Remote Controlled Microcatheter Tip Deflection under Magnetic Resonance Imaging
11:27

Magnetically-Assisted Remote Controlled Microcatheter Tip Deflection under Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: April 4, 2013

Maintenance of a Lateral Fluid Percussion Injury Device
05:16

Maintenance of a Lateral Fluid Percussion Injury Device

Published on: April 21, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Health Policy
  • Medical Law
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Medical liability costs and defensive medicine remain concerns despite an abating malpractice crisis.
  • Physicians may practice defensive medicine, ordering unnecessary services to mitigate litigation risk.
  • Liability pressure is widely believed to hinder efforts to control health service overuse.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review evidence on the effects of medical malpractice reforms published since 2006.
  • To assess the impact of traditional and innovative tort reforms on medical liability costs and defensive medicine.
  • To evaluate the effect of reforms on health spending.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of studies on medical malpractice reforms.
  • Analysis of data on medical liability costs, premiums, and awards.
  • Examination of evidence on defensive medicine practices and health spending.

Main Results:

  • Caps on noneconomic damages reduce average awards by 20-30% and slow premium growth by 6-13%.
  • Little evidence suggests other traditional tort reforms impact liability costs or defensive medicine.
  • Evidence indicates tort reforms, especially caps, can reduce health spending, though the magnitude is debated.

Conclusions:

  • Traditional tort reforms have limited success, with caps on noneconomic damages showing some effect on costs and spending.
  • Innovative tort reforms are gaining attention but lack sufficient evaluation and evidence of effectiveness.
  • Further research is needed to understand the impact of various malpractice reforms.