Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026
13:00
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
Attentional modulation of perceptual comparison for feature binding
Bo-Cheng Kuo1, Pia Rotshtein, Yei-Yu Yeh
1Department of Psychology and Research Center for Mind, Brain & Learning, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Brain and Cognition
|November 8, 2011
Summary
Attention modulates brain activity to detect changes in object features and their locations. This functional connectivity between prefrontal, parietal, and visual regions is crucial for resolving competition during change detection.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Neuroimaging
- Visual Perception
Background:
- Attentional modulation plays a key role in perceptual comparison.
- Understanding how attention resolves competition during change detection is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the neural correlates of attentional modulation in feature-binding change detection.
- To examine the role of prefrontal-parietal-visual functional connectivity in resolving inter-item competition.
Main Methods:
- Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
- Cued change detection task with manipulated change types (color-location binding vs. color feature) and retro-cue timing (early vs. late).
Main Results:
- Strong prefrontal activation observed for late cues in binding-change vs. color-change conditions, indicating heightened inter-item competition.
- Comparable behavioral and neural effects for both change types with early retro-cues.
- Significant inter-regional correlation between prefrontal and parietal regions for late cues.
- Extensive prefrontal-parietal-visual functional connectivity for detecting binding changes with late cues.
Conclusions:
- Attention significantly modulates neural activity during perceptual comparison.
- Prefrontal-parietal-visual functional coupling is critical for resolving inter-item competition in binding-change detection.
- Attention biases competition towards task-relevant information for successful change detection.
Related Concept Videos
01:12Perceptual Constancy
Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
01:15Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
01:26Visual System
Light enters the eye through the cornea, a transparent, dome-shaped surface covering the surface of the eyeball that helps to direct and focus incoming light. This light is then channeled toward the pupil, an adjustable opening whose size is controlled by the iris. The iris, a pigmented muscle, regulates the amount of light entering the eye by contracting or dilating the pupil, thereby ensuring optimal light levels for clear vision.
Once through the pupil, the light passes through the lens, a...
Once through the pupil, the light passes through the lens, a...
01:25The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...