Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Auricular prostheses.

Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology·2010
Same author

Measurement of skull bone thickness for bone-anchored hearing aids: an experimental study comparing both a novel ultrasound system (SonoPointer) and computed tomographic scanning to mechanical measurements.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2010
Same author

Ear epistheses as an alternative to autogenous reconstruction.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2009
Same author

Case 150: Van Buchem disease (hyperostosis corticalis generalisata).

Radiology·2009
Same author

Accuracy of ultrasound measurements for skull bone thickness using coded signals.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2009
Same author

First 3D ultrasound scanning, planning, and execution of CT-free milling interventions with a surgical robot.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2009

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

Implant-retained craniofacial prostheses for facial defects.

Philipp A Federspil1

  • 1Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.

GMS Current Topics in Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery
|November 11, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Craniofacial prostheses (epistheses) offer effective facial defect rehabilitation through modern silicones and bone anchorage. Extraoral implants, utilizing titanium and osseointegration, provide secure retention for even large facial prostheses.

Keywords:
craniofacial prosthesisepisthesisextraoral implantologyimplantosseointegrationplate systemscrewsurgical epistheticstitanium

More Related Videos

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

Coronoid-Temporalis Pedicled Flap for Orbital Floor Defect Reconstruction
06:32

Coronoid-Temporalis Pedicled Flap for Orbital Floor Defect Reconstruction

Published on: December 5, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

Coronoid-Temporalis Pedicled Flap for Orbital Floor Defect Reconstruction
06:32

Coronoid-Temporalis Pedicled Flap for Orbital Floor Defect Reconstruction

Published on: December 5, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Prosthodontics

Background:

  • Facial defects pose significant challenges for rehabilitation.
  • Modern silicones and bone anchorage have revolutionized treatment.
  • Osseointegration of titanium, discovered in the 1950s, paved the way for dental implants in the 1960s.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the principles of osseointegration.
  • To outline the features of extraoral implantology for craniofacial prostheses.
  • To highlight advancements in implant-retained prostheses.

Main Methods:

  • Review of historical developments in craniofacial prosthetics and implantology.
  • Discussion of osseointegration principles.
  • Examination of extraoral implant systems (solitary and grouped).

Main Results:

  • The advent of modern silicones and bone anchorage marked a breakthrough.
  • Titanium's osseointegration led to dental implants and later extraoral implants (first in 1977).
  • Various implant systems, including grouped systems, enhance reliability in challenging anatomical regions.

Conclusions:

  • Implant-retained craniofacial prostheses offer secure retention for extensive facial defects.
  • Osseointegration and atraumatic surgical techniques are fundamental to successful outcomes.
  • Extraoral implantology has advanced significantly, improving patient rehabilitation.