Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
08:01

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach

Published on: August 24, 2018

An open system approach for surgical guide production.

Marcus Abboud1, Gary Orentlicher

  • 1Department of Prosthodontics and Digital Technology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA. marcus.abboud@stonybrook.edu

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery : Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
|November 29, 2011
PubMed
Summary

A new open system for guided surgery in oral implantology offers flexibility and cost savings. This system, using a universal scan plate, achieved accurate implant placement with minimal deviation, benefiting clinicians and labs.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A digitally designed fixed subperiosteal implant solution for the treatment of the severely atrophic full-arch with an immediate-load protocol.

Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists·2025
Same author

What We Have Learned in the Treatment of Seven Severely Atrophic Maxillary Full-Arch Immediate-Load Protocol Patient Cases Treated with a Digitally Planned and Produced Screw-Retained Subperiosteal Implant, a Case Series with Surgical and Initial Prosthetic Outcomes.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2025
Same author

Comparison of One-Drill Protocol to Sequential Drilling In Vitro and In Vivo.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Thermal Evaluation of Bone Drilling with a One-Drill Protocol.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Thermal Evaluation of Bone Drilling: Assessing Drill Bits and Sequential Drilling.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Standardized Testing for Thermal Evaluation of Bone Drilling: Towards Predictive Assessment of Thermal Trauma.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2024

Area of Science:

  • Oral implantology
  • Guided surgery
  • Radiographic imaging

Background:

  • Guided surgery enhances implant placement accuracy.
  • Current systems often rely on proprietary software.
  • A need exists for open, flexible systems in guided implant surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate a novel open system for creating surgical guides in oral implantology.
  • To assess the system's independence from specific implant planning software.
  • To determine accuracy using a universal computed tomography/cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan plate.

Main Methods:

  • An in vitro study using 18 models with radiopaque markers.
  • Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were acquired using a universal scan plate.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
08:01

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach

Published on: August 24, 2018

  • Virtual implant planning was performed using two different software programs (coDiagnostiX and implant 3D).
  • A transfer plate connected the scan plate to the drill guide for position transfer.

    • Main Results:

    • Virtual implant planning was conducted for 36 implants across two software systems.
    • The med3D system showed a mean horizontal deviation of 0.33 mm.
    • The Institut Straumann system exhibited larger mean errors: 0.65 mm for implant 1 and 1.13 mm for implant 2.

    Conclusions:

    • The open system demonstrates potential for reducing dental laboratory costs.
    • It offers freedom in choosing implant planning software.
    • Ease of handling and accuracy suggest significant benefits for guided surgery adoption.