Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Charles J. Gelso (1941-2025).

The American psychologist·2026
Same author

Session evaluation scale: psychometric evaluation and development of short versions.

Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research·2025
Same author

Association between helping skills variability and subsequent client functioning: Mediated by working alliance and session evaluation.

Journal of counseling psychology·2025
Same author

Dyadic working alliance, therapist insight skills, and client outcomes: Longitudinal mediation analyses.

Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.)·2025
Same author

Broadening the evidentiary basis for clinical practice guidelines: Recommendations from qualitative psychotherapy researchers.

The American psychologist·2024
Same author

Therapist and client perceptions of the working alliance: Codevelopment, linear growth, variability, and client functioning.

Journal of counseling psychology·2023
Same journal

Presence before alliance? Longitudinal evidence from psychotherapy trainees in China.

Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.)·2026
Same journal

Real and unreal elements within the psychotherapy relationship.

Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.)·2026
Same journal

Cultural processes for addressing clients' spiritual and religious identities in psychotherapy: A proof-of-concept investigation.

Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.)·2026
Same journal

Early alliance growth and changes in attachment styles in psychotherapy.

Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.)·2026
Same journal

A qualitative meta-analysis on therapist responsiveness to dissociation: Introducing the dissociation-responsive therapy model.

Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.)·2026
Same journal

Microprocesses predicting early emotional bond in videoconferencing and face-to-face psychotherapy.

Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates
08:56

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates

Published on: January 13, 2023

Correction to hill (2005).

Clara E Hill1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Maryland.

Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.)
|November 30, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Therapist techniques, client involvement, and the therapeutic relationship are crucial and interconnected elements in successful therapy. A model outlines how these factors develop through four stages of the therapeutic process.

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

The Modified Hole Board - Measuring Behavior, Cognition and Social Interaction in Mice and Rats
08:16

The Modified Hole Board - Measuring Behavior, Cognition and Social Interaction in Mice and Rats

Published on: April 8, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates
08:56

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates

Published on: January 13, 2023

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

The Modified Hole Board - Measuring Behavior, Cognition and Social Interaction in Mice and Rats
08:16

The Modified Hole Board - Measuring Behavior, Cognition and Social Interaction in Mice and Rats

Published on: April 8, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Psychotherapy Research

Background:

  • The therapeutic process involves complex interactions between therapist actions and client engagement.
  • The therapeutic relationship is a critical factor influencing treatment outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a pantheoretical model integrating therapist techniques, client involvement, and the therapeutic relationship.
  • To examine the evolution of these variables across four stages of successful therapy.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual model development.
  • Integration of existing theoretical propositions.
  • Analysis of successful therapy stages.

Main Results:

  • Therapist techniques, client involvement, and the therapeutic relationship are inextricably intertwined.
  • A four-stage model (initial impression, beginning therapy, core work, termination) is presented for their evolution.
  • The model highlights the interplay of facilitating exploration, case conceptualization, theory-relevant tasks, and overcoming obstacles.

Conclusions:

  • A holistic approach considering all three variables is essential for understanding the therapy process.
  • Implications for psychotherapy training and future research directions are discussed.