Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
Published on: November 14, 2018
Remembering first impressions: effects of intentionality and diagnosticity on subsequent memory
Roee Gilron1, Angela H Gutchess
1Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, MS 062, P.O. Box 549110, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA.
None:
People rely on first impressions every day as an important tool to interpret social behavior. While research is beginning to reveal the neural underpinnings of first impressions, particularly through understanding the role of dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), little is known about the way in which first impressions are encoded into memory. This is surprising because first impressions are relevant from a social perspective for future interactions, requiring that they be transferred to memory. The present study used a subsequent-memory paradigm to test the conditions under which the dmPFC is implicated in the encoding of first impressions. We found that intentionally forming impressions engages the dmPFC more than does incidentally forming impressions, and that this engagement supports the encoding of remembered impressions. In addition, we found that diagnostic information, which more readily lends itself to forming trait impressions, engages the dmPFC more than does neutral information. These results indicate that the neural system subserving memory for impressions is sensitive to consciously formed impressions. The results also suggest a distinction between a social memory system and other explicit memory systems governed by the medial temporal lobes.
Related Concept Videos
First Impression
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
Flashbulb Memory
Impact of Schemas
Serial Position Effect
The Influence of Affect on Cognition

