Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

10:39
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
The Severe Sexual Sadism Scale: cross-validation and scale properties
Andreas Mokros1, Frank Schilling, Reinhard Eher
1Center for Forensic Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. andreas.mokros@puk.zh.ch
Psychological Assessment
|December 7, 2011
Summary
The Severe Sexual Sadism Scale (SSSS) effectively screens for sexual sadism in offenders. This validated tool demonstrates good reliability and criterion validity for forensic assessments.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychometrics
Background:
- Sexual sadism is a forensic concern requiring reliable assessment tools.
- Existing methods may lack sufficient psychometric validation for forensic use.
- The Severe Sexual Sadism Scale (SSSS) was developed as a screening device.
Purpose of the Study:
- To replicate the scale structure of the SSSS.
- To evaluate the psychometric properties of the SSSS in a forensic sample.
- To assess the reliability and criterion validity of the SSSS for diagnosing sexual sadism.
Main Methods:
- Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the scale structure.
- The 1-parameter logistic test model (Rasch model) was applied.
- Reliability and criterion validity were assessed using a sample of 105 Austrian sexual offenders.
Main Results:
- The study replicated the 1-dimensional scale structure of the SSSS.
- The scale demonstrated good reliability and criterion validity.
- A cutoff score of 7 yielded 56% sensitivity and 90% specificity for diagnosing sexual sadism.
Conclusions:
- The SSSS is a psychometrically sound instrument for screening severe sexual sadism.
- The scale is suitable for file-based forensic assessments of sexual offenders.
- The SSSS shows good potential for clinical diagnosis of sexual sadism.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
Reliability and Validity
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.