Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

In vitro Mutagenesis

In vitro Mutagenesis

To learn more about the function of a gene, researchers can observe what happens when the gene is inactivated or “knocked out,” by creating genetically engineered knockout animals. Knockout mice have been particularly useful as models for human diseases such as cancer, Parkinson’s disease, and diabetes.

In-vitro Mutagenesis

In-vitro Mutagenesis

To learn more about the function of a gene, researchers can observe what happens when the gene is inactivated or “knocked out,” by creating genetically engineered knockout animals. Knockout mice have been particularly useful as models for human diseases such as cancer, Parkinson’s disease, and diabetes.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Multiple-endpoint in vitro carcinogenicity test in human cell line TK6 distinguishes carcinogens from non-carcinogens and highlights mechanisms of action.

Archives of toxicology·2020

Same author

High information content assays for genetic toxicology testing: A report of the International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT).

Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis·2019

Same author

A novel, integrated in vitro carcinogenicity test to identify genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens using human lymphoblastoid cells.

Archives of toxicology·2017

Same author

From the Cover: Does the Assessment of Nondisjunction Provide a More Sensitive Assay for the Detection of Aneugens?

Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology·2017

Same author

Viral Vectors: The Road to Reducing Genotoxicity.

Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology·2016

Same author

The clastogenicity of 4NQO is cell-type dependent and linked to cytotoxicity, length of exposure and p53 proficiency.

Mutagenesis·2015

Same journal

Tracking Synthetic Adhesins on Bacterial Surfaces with Immunofluorescence Microscopy.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

Same journal

Post-Selection Methods for Analyzing mRNA Display Selections and Optimization of Hits.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

Same journal

High-Performance Computing in Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS) Peptide Identification.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

Same journal

Engineering and Adapting Disulfide-Containing Proteins to Enable Intracellular Functionality.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

Same journal

AI-Driven Protein Research: From Prediction to Design.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

Same journal

Methods for the In Vitro Selection of Protein and Peptide Libraries Using mRNA Display.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

An Automated Method to Perform The In Vitro Micronucleus Assay using Multispectral Imaging Flow Cytometry

An Automated Method to Perform The In Vitro Micronucleus Assay using Multispectral Imaging Flow Cytometry

Published on: May 13, 2019

The in vitro micronucleus assay.

Ann T Doherty¹

¹Safety Assessment, AstraZeneca, Cheshire, UK. Ann.Doherty@astrazeneca.com

Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)

|December 8, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The in vitro micronucleus test offers a faster, automated method for detecting genotoxic damage. This assay identifies both chromosome breakage and whole chromosome loss, providing a comprehensive genotoxicity assessment.

More Related Videos

Automation of the Micronucleus Assay Using Imaging Flow Cytometry and Artificial Intelligence

Automation of the Micronucleus Assay Using Imaging Flow Cytometry and Artificial Intelligence

Published on: January 27, 2023

The Micronucleus Assay on Cryopreserved Whole Blood

The Micronucleus Assay on Cryopreserved Whole Blood

Published on: February 23, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

An Automated Method to Perform The In Vitro Micronucleus Assay using Multispectral Imaging Flow Cytometry

An Automated Method to Perform The In Vitro Micronucleus Assay using Multispectral Imaging Flow Cytometry

Published on: May 13, 2019

Automation of the Micronucleus Assay Using Imaging Flow Cytometry and Artificial Intelligence

Automation of the Micronucleus Assay Using Imaging Flow Cytometry and Artificial Intelligence

Published on: January 27, 2023

The Micronucleus Assay on Cryopreserved Whole Blood

The Micronucleus Assay on Cryopreserved Whole Blood

Published on: February 23, 2024

Area of Science:

Toxicology
Genetics
Cell Biology

Background:

The in vitro micronucleus test is an alternative to the chromosome aberration test for detecting genotoxic damage.
Micronuclei formation can result from clastogenic (chromosome breakage) or aneugenic (whole chromosome loss) events.
Interphase cell analysis in the micronucleus test allows for faster scoring and increased automation compared to other methods.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide detailed methods for conducting in vitro micronucleus tests.
To describe variations including mononucleate and binucleate assays.
To incorporate techniques like centromeric labeling and non-disjunction assays for investigating aneugenic mechanisms.

Main Methods:

Performing in vitro micronucleus tests on interphase cells.
Utilizing both mononucleate and binucleate cell scoring methods.
Implementing centromeric labeling and non-disjunction assays to differentiate aneugenic effects.

Main Results:

The in vitro micronucleus test effectively detects genotoxic damage.
The assay is amenable to automation, offering faster and potentially less subjective results.
Specific methods are detailed to investigate aneugenic modes of action.

Conclusions:

The in vitro micronucleus test is a valuable tool for genotoxicity assessment.
The described methods enhance the assay's utility, particularly for identifying aneugenic potential.
Automation and improved scoring contribute to the efficiency and reliability of genotoxicity testing.