Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Angiotensin II-antagonist in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (ANTIPAF) trial
Andreas Goette1, Norbert Schön, Paulus Kirchhof
1University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. andreas.goette@med.ovgu.de
Insights
Angiotensin II receptor blockade (ARB) therapy did not reduce atrial fibrillation (AF) burden in patients without structural heart disease. This study found no significant difference in AF episodes or quality of life between olmesartan and placebo groups.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are proven safe and effective for structural heart disease.
- Previous studies showed ARBs prevent atrial fibrillation (AF) only in patients with structural heart disease.
- The ANTIPAF trial investigated ARB efficacy in paroxysmal AF without structural heart disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of olmesartan medoxomil compared to placebo on AF burden.
- To assess the efficacy of ARB therapy in patients with paroxysmal AF but no structural heart disease.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial (ANTIPAF).
- 430 patients with paroxysmal AF without structural heart disease were randomized.
- Daily transtelephonic ECG (tele-ECG) monitored AF burden over 12 months.
- Concomitant ARB, ACE inhibitor, or antiarrhythmic drug use was prohibited.
Main Results:
- The primary endpoint, AF burden, showed no significant difference between the olmesartan and placebo groups (P=0.770).
- Secondary outcomes, including quality of life, time to AF recurrence, time to persistent AF, and hospitalizations, were also not significantly different.
- Amiodarone prescription was earlier in the placebo group, the only significant intergroup difference (P=0.022).
Conclusions:
- One year of ARB therapy alone does not decrease AF episodes in patients with paroxysmal AF and no structural heart disease.
- Olmesartan is not effective in reducing AF burden in this specific patient population.
- Further research may be needed to explore ARB efficacy in different patient subgroups or with combination therapies.
Background:
Unlike antiarrhythmic drugs, the safety and beneficial effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade (ARB) in patients with structural heart disease is well established. The clinical efficacy of ARBs to prevent atrial fibrillation (AF) so far only has been shown in patients with structural heart disease. Here, we report the primary outcome of the Angiotensin II-Antagonist in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (ANTIPAF) trial, which investigated the effect of olmesartan medoxomil compared with placebo on AF burden in patients with paroxysmal AF without structural heart disease.
Methods And Results:
The ANTIPAF trial was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial analyzing the AF burden (percentage of days with documented episodes of paroxysmal AF) during a 12-month follow-up as the primary study end point. Four hundred thirty patients with documented paroxysmal AF without structural heart disease were randomized to placebo or 40 mg olmesartan per day. Concomitant therapy with ARBs, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and antiarrhythmic drugs was prohibited. Patients were followed using daily transtelephonic ECG (tele-ECG) recordings independent of symptoms. The intention-to-treat population of the trial encompassed 425 patients (placebo group, n=211; olmesartan group, n=214). A total of 87 818 tele-ECGs were analyzed in these patients during follow-up (placebo group, 44 888 ECGs; olmesartan group, 42 930 ECGs). Thus, a mean of 207 tele-ECGs were recorded per patient. The primary end point (AF burden) was not different between the 2 groups (P=0.770). Secondary outcome parameters, including quality of life, also were not different. In particular, time to first AF recurrence, time to persistent AF, and number of hospitalizations were not different between the 2 groups. The time to prescription of recovery medication (amiodarone) was the only parameter showing an intergroup difference, with earlier prescription of amiodarone in the placebo group (P=0.022).
Conclusions:
One year of ARB therapy per se does not reduce the number of AF episodes in patients with documented paroxysmal AF without structural heart disease. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00098137.
Related Concept Videos
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Endothelin Receptor Antagonists
ETs are synthesized through a complex sequence of enzymatic steps, primarily involving an enzyme referred to as endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE). Of...
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Prostacyclin Receptor Agonists
These agonists bind to the IPR receptor situated on the plasma membrane of the pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. This binding triggers a cascade of reactions known as the GS-AC-cAMP-PKA pathway. This pathway results in the relaxation of smooth muscle...
Antihypertensive Drugs: Direct Renin Inhibitors
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

