Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Chapter VI: Follow-up after revascularisation
F Dick1, J-B Ricco, A H Davies
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Swiss Cardiovascular Centre, University Hospital Berne, Switzerland. florian.dick@insel.ch
Insights
Structured follow-up is crucial for chronic critical limb ischaemia (CLI) patients after revascularisation. This involves optimizing medical therapy, monitoring arterial reconstruction, and timely repeat interventions for better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Clinical Guidelines
Background:
- Chronic critical limb ischaemia (CLI) management requires structured follow-up post-revascularisation for sustained success and optimal patient care.
- Current guidelines inadequately address CLI follow-up, often assuming initial revascularisation efficacy dictates prognosis.
- CLI patients are frequently elderly and frail, making preserved ambulatory capacity vital for independent living and overall prognosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To challenge the neglect of post-CLI revascularisation follow-up in existing guidelines.
- To recommend evidence-based best clinical practices for CLI follow-up.
- To critically appraise evidence across medical therapy, surveillance, and repeat interventions.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and critical appraisal of available evidence on structured follow-up domains for CLI.
- Analysis of antiplatelet/antithrombotic therapy, clinical surveillance, and duplex ultrasound use.
- Evaluation of indications and types of repeat interventions for failing or failed reconstructions.
Main Results:
- Evidence for specific CLI follow-up strategies is limited, often requiring extrapolation from broader patient populations.
- Recommendations are frequently based on subgroup analyses, leading to a degradation in evidence strength.
- Endovascular and surgical approaches, along with specific comorbidities like diabetes and renal failure, are considered separately.
Conclusions:
- Structured follow-up is essential for chronic critical limb ischaemia (CLI) patients post-revascularisation.
- Key components include optimizing medical therapy, diligent surveillance of arterial reconstruction, and prompt repeat interventions.
- Future research is needed to strengthen the evidence base for CLI follow-up protocols.
Abstract:
Structured follow-up after revascularisation for chronic critical limb ischaemia (CLI) aims at sustained treatment success and continued best patient care. Thereby, efforts need to address three fundamental domains: (A) best medical therapy, both to protect the arterial reconstruction locally and to reduce atherosclerotic burden systemically; (B) surveillance of the arterial reconstruction; and (C) timely initiation of repeat interventions. As most CLI patients are elderly and frail, sustained resolution of CLI and preserved ambulatory capacity may decide over independent living and overall prognosis. Despite this importance, previous guidelines have largely ignored follow-up after CLI; arguably because of a striking lack of evidence and because of a widespread assumption that, in the context of CLI, efficacy of initial revascularisation will determine prognosis during the short remaining life expectancy. This chapter of the current CLI guidelines aims to challenge this disposition and to recommend evidentially best clinical practice by critically appraising available evidence in all of the above domains, including antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy, clinical surveillance, use of duplex ultrasound, and indications for and preferred type of repeat interventions for failing and failed reconstructions. However, as corresponding studies are rarely performed among CLI patients specifically, evidence has to be consulted that derives from expanded patient populations. Therefore, most recommendations are based on extrapolations or subgroup analyses, which leads to an almost systematic degradation of their strength. Endovascular reconstruction and surgical bypass are considered separately, as are specific contexts such as diabetes or renal failure; and critical issues are highlighted throughout to inform future studies.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care