Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

Modeling Spontaneous Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) in Mice Following Nephrectomy
Published on: April 29, 2014
VEGF pathway-targeted therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Fei Liu1, Xianguo Chen2, Ejun Peng3
1Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China. phiger81@163.com.
Abstract:
Immunotherapy which has been in practice for more than 20 years proves effective for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Anti-angiogenesis-targeted therapy has recently been identified as a promising therapeutic strategy for mRCC. This study was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway-targeted therapy for mRCC by comparing its effectiveness with that of immunotherapy. The electronic databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on comparison of VEGF inhibiting drugs (sorafenib, sunitinib and bevacizumab) with interferon (IFN) or placebo for mRCC treatment were included. Data were pooled to meta-analyze. A total of 7 RCTs with 3451 patients were involved. The results showed that anti-VEGF agents improved progression-free survival (PFS) and offered substantial clinical benefits to patients with mRCC. Among them, sunitinib had a higher overall response rate (ORR) than IFN (47% versus 12%, P<0.000001). Bevacizumab plus IFN produced a superior PFS [risk ratio (RR): 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-0.97; P=0.01] and ORR (RR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.72-2.78; P<0.00001) in patients with mRCC over IFN, but it yielded an increase by 31% in the risk of serious toxic effects (RR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.20-1.43; P<0.00001) as compared with IFN. The overall survival (OS) was extended by sorafenib (17.8 months) and sunitinib (26.4 months) as compared with IFN (13 months). It was concluded that compared with IFN therapy, VEGF pathway-targeted therapies improved PFS and achieved significant therapeutic benefits in mRCC. However, the risk to benefit ratio of these agents needs to be further evaluated.
Insights
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted therapies show improved progression-free survival for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) compared to immunotherapy. While offering benefits, the risk-benefit ratio of these novel mRCC treatments requires further evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Immunotherapy has been a standard treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) for over two decades.
- Anti-angiogenesis targeted therapy, specifically inhibiting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway, has emerged as a promising strategy for mRCC.
- Direct comparison of VEGF pathway-targeted therapy efficacy against established immunotherapy is crucial for optimizing mRCC treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway-targeted therapy in treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).
- To compare the efficacy of VEGF inhibiting drugs (sorafenib, sunitinib, bevacizumab) with traditional immunotherapy (interferon) and placebo in mRCC patients.
- To analyze progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxic effects associated with these treatments.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of electronic databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
- Inclusion criteria focused on RCTs comparing VEGF inhibiting drugs (sorafenib, sunitinib, bevacizumab) against interferon (IFN) or placebo for mRCC.
- Meta-analysis of pooled data from 7 RCTs involving 3451 patients to assess treatment outcomes and safety profiles.
Main Results:
- Anti-VEGF agents significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and demonstrated substantial clinical benefits for mRCC patients.
- Sunitinib showed a higher overall response rate (ORR) compared to interferon (47% vs 12%).
- Bevacizumab plus interferon improved PFS and ORR but increased the risk of serious toxic effects by 31% compared to interferon alone. Sorafenib and sunitinib extended overall survival (OS) compared to interferon.
Conclusions:
- VEGF pathway-targeted therapies offer improved PFS and significant therapeutic benefits for mRCC compared to interferon therapy.
- Specific agents like sunitinib demonstrate superior ORR, while combinations like bevacizumab plus interferon show enhanced PFS and ORR, albeit with increased toxicity.
- The risk-to-benefit ratio of VEGF pathway-targeted therapies in mRCC warrants further comprehensive evaluation to guide clinical decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Tumor Immunotherapy
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Endothelin Receptor Antagonists
ETs are synthesized through a complex sequence of enzymatic steps, primarily involving an enzyme referred to as endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE). Of...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
