Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a polypeptide...
Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence.
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Extending structural surfaceomics to identify aberrant conformations of tumor surface proteins as potential immunotherapy targets.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Systematic discovery of pro- and anti-HIV host factors in primary human CD4+ T cells.

Cell·2026
Same author

The scientific legacy of Martin Karplus from the perspective of his collaborators.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same author

The filamentous ultrastructure of the PopZ condensate is required for its cellular function.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2026
Same author

ModelCIF Update: Supporting Emerging Classes of Computational Macromolecular Models.

Journal of molecular biology·2026
Same author

IHMValidation: Assessment of Integrative Structure Models Deposited to the Protein Data Bank.

Journal of molecular biology·2025
Same journal

Mapping the 3D Chromosome Organization of a Biosynthetic Gene Cluster by Capture Hi-C (CHi-C).

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Mapping the 3D Chromosome Organization of Streptomyces by Hi-C.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

CUT&Tag Epigenomic Profiling of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Rhizobium rhizogenes-Mediated Hairy Root Transformation Protocol for Lotus japonicus and Other Legumes.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Characterization of Bioactive Saponins from Sea Cucumbers.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Methods for Functional Validation of Terpenoid Metabolic Clusters in Nicotiana benthamiana and Aspergillus oryzae.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

Virtual ligand screening against comparative protein structure models.

Hao Fan1, John J Irwin, Andrej Sali

  • 1Department of Bioengineering & Therapeutic Sciences, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. hfan@salilab.org

Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)
|December 21, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Virtual ligand screening computationally discovers protein ligands. This study integrates comparative modeling and docking to expand screening beyond experimental structures, enabling broader drug discovery.

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source
08:35

Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source

Published on: May 29, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source
08:35

Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source

Published on: May 29, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Drug discovery
  • Structural bioinformatics

Background:

  • Virtual ligand screening (VLS) identifies potential protein-binding molecules computationally.
  • Traditional VLS relies on experimentally determined protein structures (X-ray crystallography, NMR).
  • Comparative protein structure modeling offers an alternative when experimental structures are unavailable.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present an integrated computational protocol for virtual ligand screening.
  • To extend the application of VLS to proteins lacking experimental structures.
  • To combine comparative modeling with docking for enhanced ligand discovery.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized MODELLER for comparative protein structure modeling.
  • Employed DOCK for virtual ligand screening against modeled structures.
  • Integrated MODELLER and DOCK into a unified computational workflow.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated the feasibility of applying VLS to homology-modeled protein structures.
  • Successfully combined comparative modeling and docking protocols.
  • Established a method to broaden the scope of computational drug discovery.

Conclusions:

  • The integrated protocol enhances the applicability of virtual ligand screening.
  • Comparative modeling provides a viable route for VLS when experimental data is limited.
  • This approach facilitates the discovery of novel ligands for a wider range of protein targets.