Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

A Protocol to Characterize the Morphological Changes of Clostridium difficile in Response to Antibiotic Treatment
Published on: May 25, 2017
Comparative effectiveness of Clostridium difficile treatments: a systematic review
Dimitri M Drekonja1, Mary Butler, Roderick MacDonald
1Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417, USA. drek0002@umn.edu
Background:
Clostridium difficile infection is increasing in incidence and severity. The optimal treatment is unknown.
Purpose:
To determine whether, among adults with C. difficile infection, treatment with certain antibiotics compared with others results in differences in initial cure, recurrence, and harms.
Data Sources:
MEDLINE, AMED, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases (search dates: inception through August 2011, limited to English-language reports); bibliography review.
Study Selection:
Randomized, controlled trials of adults with C. difficile infection, independent of outcomes, who were treated with medications available in the United States. Observational studies reporting strain were included.
Data Extraction:
Study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality and strength of evidence as assessed by 2 reviewers, study definitions, and duration of treatment and follow-up. Outcomes included initial cure, recurrence, and treatment harms.
Data Synthesis:
11 trials that included 1463 participants were identified. Three trials compared metronidazole with vancomycin; 8 compared metronidazole or vancomycin with another agent, combined agents, or placebo. Strain was analyzed in 1 trial and 2 cohort studies. No study comparing 2 antimicrobial agents demonstrated a statistically significant difference for initial cure; all comparisons were of low to moderate strength of evidence. Moderate-strength evidence from 1 study demonstrated that recurrence was decreased with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin (15% vs. 25%; difference, -10 percentage points [95% CI, -17 to -3 percentage points]; P=0.005). Subgroup analysis of a single study comparing metronidazole with vancomycin for patients who have severe C. difficile infection showed no difference by intention-to-treat analysis; this was rated as insufficient-strength evidence. Harms, when reported, did not differ between treatments in any study.
Limitations:
Definitions of diarrhea, C. difficile infection, initial cure, and relapse varied. Some studies reported insufficient detail to allow assessment of all randomly assigned participants or of harms.
Conclusion:
No antimicrobial agent is clearly superior for the initial cure of C. difficile infection. Recurrence is less frequent with fidaxomicin than with vancomycin.
Primary Funding Source:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Related Concept Videos
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Treating Helicobacter pylori in Peptic Ulcers: Antimicrobial Therapy
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Antimicrobials as Antidiarrheal Agents
Drugs for Treatment of Diarrhea-Predominant IBS
Two specific drugs used in the treatment are alosetron (Lotronex) and eluxadoline (Viberzi). Alosetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist, works by slowing the movement of stools in the gut, reducing bowel...
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
