Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Three-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology01:28

Three-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology

Three-dimensional imaging techniques are essential in cell biology, allowing researchers to visualize intricate cellular structures with high resolution. Two prominent methods, Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy (DIC) and Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy (CSLM), provide distinct advantages for imaging live and thick specimens, respectively.Differential Interference Contrast MicroscopyDIC microscopy enhances contrast in transparent, unstained samples by converting phase...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learning to Diagnose Privately: DP-Powered LLMs for Radiology Report Classification.

IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions·2026
Same author

Characterizing ferrous versus ferric iron in Alzheimer's disease using X-ray fluorescence imaging and XANES spectroscopy.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2026
Same author

Context-Aware Transformer GAN for Direct Generation of Attenuation and Scatter Corrected PET Data.

IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences·2026
Same author

Biomarkers.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Measurement quality metrics to improve absolute microbial cell counting.

Frontiers in microbiology·2025
Same author

Clinical and Imaging Factors Impacting Positive Predictive Value of Prostate MRI.

Radiology·2025
Same journal

The Banality of Cancer: Entropy As a Third Pillar of Lung Nodule Risk Assessment.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

A Narrow Window for Artificial Intelligence-Generated Synthetic Temporal Bone CT From MRI.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

From Uncertainty to Actionable Management: The Isolated Abnormal Axillary Lymph Node.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

Beyond Detection: Translating Artificial Intelligence-Driven Opportunistic Screening Into Clinical Action.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

Navigating PSMA PET Radiopharmaceuticals: Clinical and Operational Factors.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

From Mesenteric Ischemia to Intestinal Stroke.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

Three-Dimensional Imaging of Tumor-Bearing Tissue Using the Iterative Bleaching Extends Multiplexity Approach
07:16

Three-Dimensional Imaging of Tumor-Bearing Tissue Using the Iterative Bleaching Extends Multiplexity Approach

Published on: April 25, 2025

Quality Improvement in 3D Imaging.

Laura Pierce1, Kala Raman, Jarrett Rosenberg

  • 1Duke Multi-Dimensional Image Processing Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Duke University, 2424 Erwin Rd, Ste 302, Durham, NC 27705, USA. lauraj.pierce@duke.edu

AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
|December 24, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A quality control program significantly reduced 3D imaging errors, especially for less experienced technologists. This demonstrates that performance monitoring and mentoring are key to improving 3D image quality and assurance.

More Related Videos

Pioneering Patient-Specific Approaches for Precision Surgery Using Imaging and Virtual Reality
06:18

Pioneering Patient-Specific Approaches for Precision Surgery Using Imaging and Virtual Reality

Published on: April 5, 2024

Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization
06:50

Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization

Published on: March 3, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

Three-Dimensional Imaging of Tumor-Bearing Tissue Using the Iterative Bleaching Extends Multiplexity Approach
07:16

Three-Dimensional Imaging of Tumor-Bearing Tissue Using the Iterative Bleaching Extends Multiplexity Approach

Published on: April 25, 2025

Pioneering Patient-Specific Approaches for Precision Surgery Using Imaging and Virtual Reality
06:18

Pioneering Patient-Specific Approaches for Precision Surgery Using Imaging and Virtual Reality

Published on: April 5, 2024

Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization
06:50

Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization

Published on: March 3, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Quality Assurance
  • Radiologic Technology

Background:

  • Generating accurate 3D images is crucial for medical diagnosis.
  • Reducing errors in 3D image generation is an ongoing challenge in radiology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of a quality control program on minimizing errors in 3D image creation.

Main Methods:

  • Six 3D technologists' error rates were monitored over 3 months using standardized protocols.
  • A training intervention was implemented, followed by a 9-month post-training observation period.
  • Error rates before and after the intervention were compared.

Main Results:

  • The overall error rate decreased from 16.1% to 7.2% post-training, despite increased examination volume.
  • Less experienced technologists showed greater improvement (10.6% to 5.2% error rate) compared to experienced ones.
  • Turnaround time for examinations within 4 hours significantly increased post-training.

Conclusions:

  • Quality control programs do not hinder productivity and are essential for improving 3D imaging services.
  • Performance monitoring and technologist mentoring are vital components of effective quality assurance.
  • Targeted training significantly enhances the quality of 3D image generation.