Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) primarily center around electronically documenting patients' health information within a single healthcare organization or practice. They contain essential clinical data related to a patient's medical history, diagnoses, medications, treatment plans, lab results, and other pertinent information relevant to the specific encounter or episode of care. EMRs are designed to streamline documentation and workflow processes within individual healthcare settings,...

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...

Statistical Analysis: Overview

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Accuracy and Precision

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate measurements...

Accuracy and Precision

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate measurements...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Test-Retest Reliability and Mode Effects on Single-Item and Multi-Item Measures in a Survey of Adolescent and Young Adults with Cancer.

Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology·2026

Same author

Longitudinal Adherence With Stool-Based Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Four United States Health Systems.

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association·2026

Same author

Impacts of a Public Health Emergency on Cancer Testing Rates, Follow-up, and Cancer Diagnosis: an Evaluation of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026

Same author

BMI and Initiation of Cancer Screening: A Closer Look at Differences by Race, Ethnicity, and Sex in a Multicenter Population.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026

Same author

Identifying COVID-19 Disease Severity in Real-World Data: Implications for Medical Product Effectiveness Studies.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2026

Same author

Positive predictive value of symptoms for early-onset colorectal cancer.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

Tradeoffs between accuracy measures for electronic health care data algorithms.

Jessica Chubak¹, Gaia Pocobelli, Noel S Weiss

¹Group Health Research Institute, Group Health, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. chubak.j@ghc.org

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

|December 27, 2011

Summary

When using electronic health care data algorithms for research, epidemiologists must prioritize accuracy measures like sensitivity and specificity. Publishing all tested algorithms aids future research refinement.

More Related Videos

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Published on: February 21, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Published on: February 21, 2025

Area of Science:

Health Services Research
Epidemiology
Biostatistics

Background:

Electronic health care data offers valuable resources for research.
Algorithms are increasingly used to extract information from this data.
Assessing algorithm accuracy is crucial for reliable research outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

To review the applications of electronic health care data algorithms.
To examine various measures of algorithm accuracy.
To discuss the rationale for prioritizing specific accuracy metrics.

Main Methods:

Utilized real-world studies to demonstrate algorithm applications in epidemiologic and health services research.
Employed hypothetical scenarios to illustrate misclassification impacts on exposure and outcome ascertainment.
Reviewed established metrics for evaluating algorithm performance.

Main Results:

High sensitivity is vital for reducing costs, enhancing study inclusivity, and identifying common exposures.
High specificity is crucial for accurate outcome classification.
Positive and negative predictive values are important for cohort identification and exclusion criteria adherence, respectively.

Conclusions:

Epidemiologists frequently need to prioritize specific accuracy measures based on study objectives.
Recommends publishing all tested algorithms, including those with suboptimal accuracy, to facilitate future research and algorithm development.