Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Developing and paying for medicines for orphan indications in oncology: utilitarian regulation vs equitable care?
J E Davies1, S Neidle, D G Taylor
1Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, BMA/Tavistock House, London, WC1H 9JP, UK.
Abstract:
Despite 'orphan drug' legislation, bringing new medicines for rare diseases to market and securing funding for their provision is sometimes both costly and problematic, even in the case of medicines for very rare 'ultra orphan' oncological indications. In this paper difficulties surrounding the introduction of a new treatment for osteosarcoma exemplify the challenges that innovators can face. The implications of current policy debate on 'value-based' medicines pricing in Europe, North America and elsewhere are also explored in the context of sustaining research into and facilitating cancer patient access to medicines for low-prevalence indications. Tensions exist between utilitarian strategies aimed at optimising the welfare of the majority in the society and minority-interest-focused approaches to equitable care provision. Current regulatory and pricing strategies should be revisited with the objective of facilitating fair and timely drug supply to patients without sacrificing safety or overall affordability. Failures effectively to tackle the problems considered here could undermine public interests in developing better therapies for cancer patients.
Insights
Bringing new orphan drugs for rare cancers like osteosarcoma to patients is challenging due to high costs and complex pricing. Policy changes are needed to ensure fair access to vital cancer treatments for all patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Health Economics
- Pharmaceutical Policy
Background:
- Orphan drug legislation aims to incentivize rare disease drug development but faces challenges.
- Bringing ultra-orphan oncological treatments to market involves significant costs and access hurdles.
- Osteosarcoma treatment exemplifies difficulties in drug innovation and provision for rare cancers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the challenges in developing and funding treatments for rare oncological indications.
- To explore the impact of value-based pricing policies on rare cancer drug access.
- To analyze the tension between societal welfare and equitable care for rare disease patients.
Main Methods:
- Case study analysis of a new osteosarcoma treatment.
- Review of current policy debates on medicine pricing in Europe and North America.
- Exploration of ethical considerations in healthcare resource allocation.
Main Results:
- Innovators face substantial difficulties in introducing new treatments for ultra-orphan oncological indications.
- Value-based pricing debates highlight tensions between majority welfare and minority care needs.
- Current regulatory and pricing strategies may impede timely patient access to essential medicines.
Conclusions:
- Revisiting regulatory and pricing strategies is crucial for equitable and timely drug supply.
- Ensuring patient access to rare cancer therapies requires balancing safety, affordability, and innovation.
- Failure to address these issues could jeopardize public interest in developing novel cancer treatments.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Prescription, Nonprescription and Orphan Drugs
The misuse and addiction to prescription drugs is a growing problem that can affect people of all age groups, specifically teenagers. This can happen when prescription medications are used in ways not intended by the prescriber, such as taking someone else's prescription or using medication for...
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Dosage Regimen: Individualization

