Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

07:57
Fish Sperm Assessment Using Software and Cooling Devices
Published on: July 28, 2018
Automatic evaluation of ram sperm morphometry
J L Yániz1, S Vicente-Fiel, S Capistrós
1Institute of Environmental Sciences (IUCA) and Department of Animal Production, University of Zaragoza, Spain. jyaniz@unizar.es
Theriogenology
|January 10, 2012
Summary
A new automated method using fluorescence microscopy accurately assesses ram sperm morphometry. Glutaraldehyde fixation is recommended for reliable results, showing minimal impact from drying or fixation methods.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Science
- Reproductive Biology
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Sperm morphometry is crucial for assessing male fertility.
- Traditional methods for sperm analysis can be time-consuming and subjective.
- Objective and automated assessment of sperm parameters is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a novel automated method for ram sperm head morphometry using fluorescence microscopy and image analysis.
- To evaluate the effects of air-drying and different fixation methods (glutaraldehyde, methanol) on sperm morphometric parameters.
- To compare the new automated method with a conventional CASA-Morph (CASMA) system.
Main Methods:
- Ejaculates from rams were processed fresh, air-dried, or fixed with glutaraldehyde (GLUT) or methanol (MET).
- Fluorescence microscopy (Hoechst 33342) and ImageJ software were used for automated sperm head analysis.
- The developed method was compared against a conventional CASMA method (Hemacolor staining, ISAS software).
Main Results:
- The automated method provided fast and precise analysis of sperm head morphometry.
- Air-drying significantly decreased sperm head dimensions (area reduced by 9.1%).
- Glutaraldehyde fixation yielded morphometric results closest to fresh sperm and improved image quality compared to drying or methanol fixation.
- The new automated method analyzed a higher percentage of sperm (100%) compared to CASMA (93%) and showed significant correlations for all parameters.
Conclusions:
- Automated sperm morphometry using fluorescence microscopy and image analysis is feasible and efficient for routine semen analysis.
- Glutaraldehyde fixation is recommended for optimal sperm morphometry assessment in rams.
- The impact of drying and fixation on sperm morphometry may be less significant than previously assumed, especially with advanced automated methods.

