Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classical Conditioning in Daily Life01:17

Classical Conditioning in Daily Life

Classical conditioning, a fundamental principle of associative learning, explains various phenomena observed in daily life, such as fear development, the placebo effect, taste aversion, and drug habituation. These applications demonstrate the profound impact of associative learning on human behavior and physiological responses.
John B. Watson and Rosalie Rayner famously demonstrated the development of fear through classical conditioning in their experiment with Little Albert. They paired the...
Classical Conditioning01:18

Classical Conditioning

Associative learning, a core principle in behavioral psychology, involves forming connections between events and facilitating learned responses. This concept is vividly illustrated by classical conditioning, a process extensively studied by the Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov. Pavlov's pioneering research on dogs' digestive systems led to the discovery that behaviors can be learned through association, laying the groundwork for classical conditioning.
Ivan Pavlov observed that dogs salivated...
Real-World Application of Classical Conditioning01:15

Real-World Application of Classical Conditioning

Classical conditioning not only includes the initial pairing of stimuli but also extends to more complex forms, such as higher-order conditioning. Higher-order conditioning involves creating associations beyond the primary conditioned stimulus, resulting in a chain of conditioned responses.
Higher-order, or second-order, conditioning occurs when a neutral stimulus becomes associated with an already established conditioned stimulus through repeated pairings. For instance, if a dog has been...
Principles of Classical Conditioning01:23

Principles of Classical Conditioning

Classical conditioning, as described by Ivan Pavlov, is a foundational concept in associative learning, where a neutral stimulus becomes capable of eliciting a conditioned response through association with an unconditioned stimulus. The process of acquisition, where this learning occurs, and the subsequent phenomena of contiguity, contingency, generalization, discrimination, extinction, and spontaneous recovery are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of classical conditioning.
During the...
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An optimized procedure for robust volitional cocaine intake in mice.

Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology·2020
Same author

Nicotine disrupts safety learning by enhancing fear associated with a safety cue via the dorsal hippocampus.

Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)·2017
Same author

Long-term effects of chronic nicotine on emotional and cognitive behaviors and hippocampus cell morphology in mice: comparisons of adult and adolescent nicotine exposure.

The European journal of neuroscience·2016
Same author

Acute nicotine enhances spontaneous recovery of contextual fear and changes c-fos early gene expression in infralimbic cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala.

Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)·2016
Same author

Neuro-anatomic mapping of dopamine D1 receptor involvement in nicotine self-administration in rats.

Neuropharmacology·2015
Same author

Strain-dependent performance in nicotine-induced conditioned place preference.

Behavioral neuroscience·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

A Method for Remotely Silencing Neural Activity in Rodents During Discrete Phases of Learning
09:22

A Method for Remotely Silencing Neural Activity in Rodents During Discrete Phases of Learning

Published on: June 22, 2015

Classical conditioning mechanisms can differentiate between seeing and doing in rats.

Munir G Kutlu1, Nestor A Schmajuk

  • 1Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes
|January 11, 2012
PubMed
Summary

The attentional-associative SLG model explains rat behavior in classical conditioning experiments, demonstrating that interventions affect responding differently based on training type. This supports associative learning processes over causal models.

More Related Videos

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments
09:43

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

Visual Classical Conditioning in Wood Ants
05:46

Visual Classical Conditioning in Wood Ants

Published on: October 5, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

A Method for Remotely Silencing Neural Activity in Rodents During Discrete Phases of Learning
09:22

A Method for Remotely Silencing Neural Activity in Rodents During Discrete Phases of Learning

Published on: June 22, 2015

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments
09:43

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

Visual Classical Conditioning in Wood Ants
05:46

Visual Classical Conditioning in Wood Ants

Published on: October 5, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Animal Behavior
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Classical conditioning research in rats has been interpreted as evidence for causal learning.
  • Existing models struggle to explain how interventions affect associative learning in different training paradigms.
  • The Schmajuk, Lam, and Gray (1996) attentional-associative SLG model offers an alternative framework.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the predictive power of the SLG model against experimental data on causal learning in rats.
  • To determine if the SLG model can account for the effects of interventions in common-cause, direct-cause, and causal-chain training.
  • To compare the SLG model's predictions with causal model theory.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing experimental data on rat classical conditioning, focusing on intervention effects.
  • Application of the attentional-associative SLG model to predict behavioral outcomes under different training conditions.
  • Comparison of model predictions with empirical results from key studies (Leising et al., 2008; Dwyer et al., 2009; Blaisdell et al., 2006).

Main Results:

  • The SLG model accurately predicted that interventions attenuate responding after common-cause training but not after direct-cause or causal-chain training.
  • Model predictions regarding the similarity of results between different experimental setups (e.g., Leising et al. vs. Dwyer et al.) were confirmed.
  • The model explains intervention effects through known associative mechanisms like overshadowing and latent inhibition.

Conclusions:

  • The SLG model provides a robust explanation for experimental findings previously attributed to causal learning.
  • Intervention effects in classical conditioning are likely mediated by established associative learning processes, not necessarily causal inference.
  • This research supports the SLG associative model over causal model theories in explaining complex learning phenomena in rats.