Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026
05:48
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Motivated reasoning and public opinion.
April A Strickland1, Charles S Taber, Milton Lodge
1Stony Brook University, USA.
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
|January 11, 2012
Summary
Politically engaged citizens defend their beliefs on healthcare policies due to motivated reasoning. Cognitive biases like prior belief, confirmation, and disconfirmation effects lead to opinion persistence and polarization.
Area of Science:
- Political Psychology
- Cognitive Science
- Public Health Policy Analysis
Background:
- Citizens often encounter information challenging their political beliefs, particularly regarding contentious issues like healthcare.
- Understanding motivated reasoning is crucial for analyzing public opinion on health policies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify cognitive mechanisms driving motivated biases in citizens' processing of health care policy information.
- To explain how these biases contribute to opinion persistence and polarization.
Main Methods:
- The study identifies and analyzes cognitive mechanisms influencing belief defense against discrepant information.
- Focuses on motivated reasoning in the context of health care policy debates.
Main Results:
- Motivated biases significantly shape perceptions of health care policies and associated political actors.
- Three key cognitive mechanisms identified: prior belief effect, confirmation bias, and disconfirmation bias.
Conclusions:
- These cognitive processes reinforce existing opinions, leading to persistent and polarized public views on health care.
- Understanding these biases is essential for effective health policy communication and public engagement.
Related Concept Videos
01:25Motivational Bias
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
02:20Routes of Persuasion
Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors?
01:30Reasoning
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
01:37Reason and Intuition
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
00:52Social Proof
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...