Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

Operation of a 25 KWth Calcium Looping Pilot-plant with High Oxygen Concentrations in the Calciner
Published on: October 25, 2017
CO₂ capture from cement plants using oxyfired precalcination and/or calcium looping
Nuria Rodríguez1, Ramón Murillo, J Carlos Abanades
1Instituto Nacional del Carbon, CSIC-INCAR Spanish Research Council (Oviedo-Spain). nr347@cam.ac.uk
Calcium looping (CaL) and oxyfired circulating fluidized bed (CFBC) precalcination offer cost-effective CO(2) capture for cement plants. CaL achieves 99% capture at $23/tCO(2), while oxyfired CFBC captures 89% at $16/tCO(2).
Area of Science:
- Chemical Engineering
- Environmental Science
- Materials Science
Background:
- Cement production is a significant source of industrial CO(2) emissions.
- Developing cost-effective carbon capture technologies is crucial for decarbonizing the cement industry.
- Calcium looping (CaL) and oxyfired circulating fluidized bed (CFBC) combustion are promising CO(2) capture strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the economic viability and CO(2) capture efficiency of two distinct capture technologies for cement plants.
- To assess the integration of CaL and oxyfired CFBC precalcination with existing cement plant infrastructure.
- To identify early-stage opportunities for large-scale industrial application of these CO(2) capture methods.
Main Methods:
- Mass and heat integration balances were calculated for both CaL and oxyfired CFBC precalcination systems.
- A comparative cost analysis was performed against a reference cement plant.
- The CaL process was adapted from power plant applications, while the oxyfired CFBC involved a precalcination step.
Main Results:
- The CaL process achieved up to 99% CO(2) capture with an avoided cost of $23/tCO(2).
- The oxyfired CFBC precalcination system captured 89% of CO(2) at a lower avoided cost of $16/tCO(2).
- Both technologies, at approximately 50 MWth scale, represent significant opportunities for industrial CO(2) capture development.
Conclusions:
- CaL and oxyfired CFBC precalcination are viable options for reducing CO(2) emissions from cement manufacturing.
- CaL offers higher capture rates, while oxyfired CFBC presents a more cost-effective solution for partial capture.
- These technologies are key to developing zero-emission cement plants and advancing large-scale CaL applications.
More Related Videos
11:14Two-way Valorization of Blast Furnace Slag: Synthesis of Precipitated Calcium Carbonate and Zeolitic Heavy Metal Adsorbent
Published on: February 21, 2017
08:17Coupling Carbon Capture from a Power Plant with Semi-automated Open Raceway Ponds for Microalgae Cultivation
Published on: August 14, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Hydration of Cement
C4 Pathway and CAM
C4 Pathway
The C4 pathway is used by plants such as...
Porosity in Cement Paste
The balance of water to cement in the mix is critical—it...
Sulfate Attack on Concrete
Sulfates from sources like soil, groundwater, or industrial effluents...
The Calvin Benson Cycle
Pozzolans
Fly ash is a...