Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

08:57
Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy With Modified Blumgart Pancreaticojejunostomy
Published on: June 17, 2018
Pyloromyotomy: randomized control trial of laparoscopic vs open technique
Sabina Siddiqui1, R Eric Heidel, Carlos A Angel
1Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Journal of Pediatric Surgery
|January 17, 2012
Summary
Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy offers superior cosmetic results compared to open surgery for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, with no significant differences in operating time, hospital stay, or complication rates.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Surgical Techniques
- Gastroenterology
Background:
- Open pyloromyotomy is the standard treatment for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.
- Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy is increasingly adopted for this condition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy in a prospective, randomized trial.
- Evaluate outcomes including operating time, complications, and long-term results.
Main Methods:
- 98 patients with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis were randomized to open or laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.
- Outcomes assessed included operating room time, postoperative stay, refeeding, complications, cosmetic results, and parental satisfaction.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were found between the two groups for primary outcomes.
- Complication rates were similar: 3 in the open group and 2 in the laparoscopic group.
- Long-term follow-up (56 months) showed significantly superior cosmetic results with the laparoscopic approach.
Conclusions:
- Both open and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy have similar outcomes regarding operating time, hospital stay, and refeeding.
- Complication rates are comparable between the two surgical methods.
- Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy provides significantly better long-term cosmetic outcomes.