Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dynamic permeability in metastable droplet interfacial bilayers.

Soft matter·2026
Same author

Online Tool for Calculating A Priori Scan Minimum Detectable Concentrations for Common Soil and Structural Surface Detectors.

Health physics·2026
Same author

Bananas for Tonks' gas: Structural transitions in bent-core molecule bi-layers.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Shape-Evolving Structured Liquids.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2025
Same author

Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future.

PNAS nexus·2024
Same author

Dynamics of wire frame glasses in two dimensions.

The Journal of chemical physics·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

Visualization of Low-Level Gamma Radiation Sources Using a Low-Cost, High-Sensitivity, Omnidirectional Compton Camera
06:28

Visualization of Low-Level Gamma Radiation Sources Using a Low-Cost, High-Sensitivity, Omnidirectional Compton Camera

Published on: January 30, 2020

Minimum detectable concentration as a function of gamma walkover survey technique.

David A King1, Nickolas Altic, Colt Greer

  • 1Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Independent Environmental Assessment and Verification, 1299 Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, TN, USA. king.david@orau.org

Health Physics
|January 18, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Variable detector height during gamma walkover surveys significantly increases minimum detectable concentrations (MDCs). Pendulum-like motion, especially over small contaminated areas, reduces detector response and detection probability.

More Related Videos

Extraction and Detection of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol in Water and Fish using High-Capacity Sorptive Extraction Probes and GC-MS
11:59

Extraction and Detection of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol in Water and Fish using High-Capacity Sorptive Extraction Probes and GC-MS

Published on: July 3, 2025

Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing
10:42

Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing

Published on: March 22, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Visualization of Low-Level Gamma Radiation Sources Using a Low-Cost, High-Sensitivity, Omnidirectional Compton Camera
06:28

Visualization of Low-Level Gamma Radiation Sources Using a Low-Cost, High-Sensitivity, Omnidirectional Compton Camera

Published on: January 30, 2020

Extraction and Detection of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol in Water and Fish using High-Capacity Sorptive Extraction Probes and GC-MS
11:59

Extraction and Detection of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol in Water and Fish using High-Capacity Sorptive Extraction Probes and GC-MS

Published on: July 3, 2025

Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing
10:42

Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing

Published on: March 22, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Radiation Detection
  • Nuclear Engineering

Background:

  • Gamma walkover surveys (GWS) aim for 100% surface coverage using a serpentine detector pattern.
  • Ideal GWS assumes a constant detector height, which is often not achieved in practice.
  • Detector height variations and pendulum-like motion can compromise survey effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the impact of variable detector height on GWS performance.
  • To demonstrate the negative effects of pendulum-like motion on minimum detectable concentrations (MDCs).
  • To compare detector responses for fixed versus variable height swing patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated detector responses for fixed and variable height swing patterns.
  • Calculated MDCs for various surface areas (0.1-30 m²) and contaminants (60Co, 137Cs, 241Am, 226Ra).
  • Utilized MicroShield™ v.7.02 for exposure rate estimates and NUREG-1575 for MDC calculations.

Main Results:

  • Pendulum-like detector motion significantly increases MDCs compared to a low, flat trajectory.
  • The increase in MDCs is most pronounced for small contaminated surface areas.
  • Up to a 47% difference in MDCs was observed under worst-case modeled conditions.

Conclusions:

  • Variable detector height, particularly pendulum motion, negatively impacts GWS sensitivity.
  • Achieving a consistent, low detector height is crucial for accurate contamination detection.
  • Survey protocols should account for potential detector motion to ensure reliable results.