Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

11:51
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior.
Katherine A DeCelles1, D Scott DeRue, Joshua D Margolis
1Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E6, Canada. katy.decelles@rotman.utoronto.ca
The Journal of Applied Psychology
|January 19, 2012
Summary
Power
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Moral Psychology
Background:
- The relationship between power and self-interest is complex.
- Existing research often links power to increased self-interest.
- The role of moral identity in moderating this relationship requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how the psychological experience of power interacts with moral identity.
- To determine whether power corrupts or enables moral identity.
- To explore the moderating effect of moral identity strength on power's influence on self-interest.
Main Methods:
- A field survey of working adults.
- A laboratory experiment.
- Measurement of subjective power experience, moral identity strength, moral awareness, and self-interested behavior.
Main Results:
- Power was associated with greater self-interest only when moral identity was weak.
- Power was associated with less self-interest when moral identity was strong.
- Power enhanced moral awareness in those with strong moral identity but decreased it in those with weak moral identity.
Conclusions:
- The effect of power on self-interest is contingent upon the strength of an individual's moral identity.
- Power does not inherently corrupt but rather amplifies existing moral identity tendencies.
- Moral awareness mediates the relationship between power, moral identity, and self-interested behavior.
Related Concept Videos
Secondary Motives: Power Motivation and Achievement Motivation
Power motivation and achievement motivation are two essential social motives identified by psychologist David McClelland. These motives influence behavior in various personal and professional contexts, shaping how individuals interact with others and pursue their goals.
Power motivation is characterized by the desire to influence, control, or have an impact on others. It is shaped by an individual's experiences, social environment, and cultural context. People with high power motivation are...
Power motivation is characterized by the desire to influence, control, or have an impact on others. It is shaped by an individual's experiences, social environment, and cultural context. People with high power motivation are...
Self-Serving Bias
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
Motivational Bias
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
Egoism and Altruism
Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?
Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Group Polarization
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
