Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Muscle Stimulation Frequency01:22

Muscle Stimulation Frequency

The contraction strength of muscles is regulated by motor neurons, which modulate the frequency of action potentials dispatched to the motor units based on the body's requirements. This process of varying the muscle stimulation frequency allows muscles to contract with a force that is precisely tailored to the needs of the moment, whether lifting a feather or a heavy box.
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Magnetically shielded high-resolution visual stimulation for OPM-MEG applications.

Biomedical physics & engineering express·2025
Same author

Suppression of natural lens fluorescence in fundus autofluorescence measurements: review of hardware solutions.

Biomedical optics express·2022
Same author

[Progressive pigmented fundus lesion after 23 years-Treatment or observation?]

Die Ophthalmologie·2022
Same author

Evaluating Current Density Modeling of Non-Invasive Eye and Brain Electrical Stimulation Using Phosphene Thresholds.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2021
Same author

Comparison of algorithms to suppress artifacts from the natural lens in fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy (FLIO).

Biomedical optics express·2020
Same author

Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

Low-Cost Electroencephalographic Recording System Combined with a Millimeter-Sized Coil to Transcranially Stimulate the Mouse Brain In Vivo
05:26

Low-Cost Electroencephalographic Recording System Combined with a Millimeter-Sized Coil to Transcranially Stimulate the Mouse Brain In Vivo

Published on: May 26, 2023

High frequency oscillations evoked by peripheral magnetic stimulation.

S Biller1, L Simon, P Fiedler

  • 1Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Ilmenau University of Technology, D-98684 Ilmenau, Germany. sebastian.biller@tuilmenau.de

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference
|January 19, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Peripheral magnetic stimulation of the median nerve can evoke somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP), including low and high frequency components. While less unpleasant for patients, magnetic stimulation yielded lower amplitudes and increased latencies compared to electrical methods.

More Related Videos

Electromagnetic Source Imaging in Presurgical Evaluation of Children with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy
09:57

Electromagnetic Source Imaging in Presurgical Evaluation of Children with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

Published on: September 20, 2024

Brain State-dependent Brain Stimulation with Real-time Electroencephalography-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
08:50

Brain State-dependent Brain Stimulation with Real-time Electroencephalography-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Published on: August 20, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Low-Cost Electroencephalographic Recording System Combined with a Millimeter-Sized Coil to Transcranially Stimulate the Mouse Brain In Vivo
05:26

Low-Cost Electroencephalographic Recording System Combined with a Millimeter-Sized Coil to Transcranially Stimulate the Mouse Brain In Vivo

Published on: May 26, 2023

Electromagnetic Source Imaging in Presurgical Evaluation of Children with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy
09:57

Electromagnetic Source Imaging in Presurgical Evaluation of Children with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

Published on: September 20, 2024

Brain State-dependent Brain Stimulation with Real-time Electroencephalography-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
08:50

Brain State-dependent Brain Stimulation with Real-time Electroencephalography-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Published on: August 20, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and fields (SEF) are crucial for assessing nervous system function.
  • Standard median nerve stimulation uses electrical stimuli, which can be uncomfortable and prone to errors.
  • There is a need for alternative stimulation techniques that reduce patient stress and improve accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate peripheral magnetic stimulation (PMS) of the median nerve as an alternative to electrical stimulation.
  • To compare the evoked SEPs, including low-frequency components (LFC) and high-frequency oscillations (HFO), between magnetic and electrical stimulation.
  • To assess patient comfort during magnetic versus electrical stimulation.

Main Methods:

  • A commercial transcranial magnetic stimulation system was adapted for peripheral magnetic stimulation of the median nerve.
  • Simultaneous EEG recordings were used to capture SEPs.
  • Amplitude, latency, and time-frequency characteristics of SEPs were compared between 14 healthy volunteers undergoing both electric and magnetic stimulation.
  • A psycho-perceptual evaluation of patient discomfort was conducted.

Main Results:

  • Both low-frequency components (LFC) and high-frequency oscillations (HFO) were successfully evoked by peripheral magnetic stimulation.
  • Magnetic stimulation resulted in significantly lower amplitudes and increased latencies for both LFC and HFO compared to electrical stimulation.
  • This suggests magnetic stimulation may not elicit supramaximal responses.
  • 12 out of 14 volunteers reported magnetic stimulation as less unpleasant.

Conclusions:

  • Peripheral magnetic stimulation is a viable technique for evoking SEPs, including LFC and HFO, related to median nerve stimulation.
  • While magnetic stimulation offers improved patient comfort, it currently produces responses with lower amplitudes and longer latencies than electrical stimulation.
  • Further research may optimize magnetic stimulation parameters to enhance response amplitude and reduce latency.