Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Purpose of Health Records I

Purpose of Health Records I

The vital purpose of health records is to provide a complete and accurate account of a patient's medical history, including communication, diagnostic and therapeutic orders, care planning, research, and quality review.
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:

Overview of Biostatistics in Health Sciences

Overview of Biostatistics in Health Sciences

Biostatistics involves the application of statistical techniques to scientific research in health-related fields, including biology and public health. These techniques are essential for designing studies, collecting data, and analyzing it to draw meaningful conclusions. Given the complexity of biological processes, particularly in studies involving human subjects, biostatistical methods are crucial for effectively organizing and interpreting data that might otherwise obscure underlying patterns...

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Upcoding in medicare: where does it matter most?

Health economics review·2024

Same author

Physician Incentive Compensation Plans in Academic Medical Centers: The Imperative to Prioritize Value.

The American journal of medicine·2021

Same author

How to Launch and Continually Enhance an Effective Medical Campus Faculty Development Program: Steps for Implementation and Lessons Learned.

Journal of healthcare leadership·2021

Same author

Voices for Social Justice and Against Racism: An AAIM Perspective.

The American journal of medicine·2021

Same author

Young Adults: Addressing the Health Needs of a Vulnerable Population.

The American journal of medicine·2020

Same author

Are Teaching Hospitals Treated Fairly in the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program?

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2018

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Perspective: key indicators in academic medicine: a suggested framework for analysis.

Keith A Joiner¹, David L Coleman

¹Center for Management Innovations in Health Care, Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA. kjoiner@email.arizona.edu

Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges

|January 26, 2012

Summary

Key Indicators in Academic Medicine (KIAMs) provide metrics for medical schools and teaching hospitals to assess organizational health and performance. This perspective offers a framework to enhance KIAMs

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Area of Science:

Academic Medicine
Medical Education
Healthcare Management

Background:

Academic Medicine introduced Key Indicators in Academic Medicine (KIAMs) to measure institutional health.
KIAMs aim to inform teaching hospitals and medical schools on performance metrics.
These indicators support growth in clinical, training, and research environments.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a framework for analyzing Key Indicators in Academic Medicine (KIAMs).
To enhance the utility and impact of the KIAMs feature.
To identify opportunities and mitigate pitfalls in developing key indicators.

Main Methods:

This perspective outlines a suggested framework for analyzing KIAMs.
Authors discuss potential challenges and strategies for indicator development.
The authors propose a structure for a national initiative.

Main Results:

A framework is presented for analyzing KIAMs.
Potential pitfalls and opportunities in indicator development are identified.
Strategies for enhancing KIAM usefulness are suggested.

Conclusions:

The proposed framework can improve the analysis of KIAMs.
Effective development of key indicators is crucial for academic medicine.
The KIAMs feature could serve as a foundation for a national project.