Where to bind in buckybowls? The dilemma of a metal ion
Dolly Vijay1, Hidehiro Sakurai, V Subramanian
1Molecular Modeling Group, Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Tarnaka, Hyderabad, 500 607, India.
Abstract:
An exhaustive computational study at the M05-2X/cc-pVDZ level which explores the binding possibilities of cations (Li(+), Na(+), K(+) and Cu(+)) to the concave and convex sides of the hub and rim rings of prototypical buckybowls, sumanene (C(21)H(12)) and corannulene (C(20)H(10)), has been carried out. Five distinct minima on the potential energy surface of sumanene and four on the potential energy surface of corannulene were identified. The complex where the metal ion binds to the convex side of the 6-membered rim ring is adjudged as the most stable complex for both the bowls considered. The cation-π interaction energies of buckybowls are compared with model systems such as benzene, cyclopentadiene, indene and coronene. Energy decomposition analysis has also been performed to delineate the contribution from various components contributing to the cation-π binding strength.
Related Concept Videos
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Complexation Equilibria: The Chelate Effect
Complexation Equilibria: Factors Influencing Stability of Complexes
Valence Bond Theory
Formation of Complex Ions
Complexometric Titration: Ligands


