Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of attention,...

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Cardiorespiratory fitness and body mass index of Nigerian youth: A FitnessGram-based assessment.

World journal of clinical pediatrics·2026

Same author

School based physical fitness testing: challenges and opportunities.

Pediatric research·2026

Same author

The Ability of Monitor-Independent Movement Summary Units, Euclidean Norm Minus One, and Mean Amplitude Deviation to Harmonize Accelerometry Data Across Research-Grade and Consumer Wearable Devices During Simulated Free-Living Physical Activity in Children.

Journal for the measurement of physical behaviour·2026

Same author

Correction: The WEAR-BOT checklist: A risk of bias tool for evaluating validity and reliability research in wearable technology.

PloS one·2026

Same author

The WEAR-BOT checklist: A risk of bias tool for evaluating validity and reliability research in wearable technology.

PloS one·2026

Same author

Development of a Modifiable Fall Risk Score for evaluating changes in fall risk over time.

Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity

Published on: March 7, 2019

Modeling errors in physical activity recall data.

Sarah M Nusser¹, Nicholas K Beyler, Gregory J Welk

¹Dept of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

Journal of Physical Activity & Health

|January 31, 2012

Summary

Statistical models can correct for measurement errors in physical activity recalls, leading to more accurate population-level estimates of usual activity patterns. This improves understanding of long-term physical activity behavior.

More Related Videos

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Published on: February 21, 2025

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training

Published on: July 27, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity

Published on: March 7, 2019

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Published on: February 21, 2025

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training

Published on: July 27, 2022

Area of Science:

Epidemiology
Biostatistics
Physical Activity Research

Background:

Physical activity recall instruments are cost-effective but prone to systematic and random measurement errors.
Statistical modeling offers a method to estimate and correct for these measurement errors.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a statistical measurement error model for short-term physical activity recalls.
To accurately estimate long-term usual physical activity parameters in a population.

Main Methods:

A measurement error model was developed for short-term activity recalls.
The model accounts for systematic and random errors in recall data.
Replicate observations from concurrent recall and objective monitoring on a subsample were used for parameter estimation.

Main Results:

Preliminary data showed recalls tend to overestimate actual physical activity.
Measurement errors significantly increased recall variance compared to actual activity variation.
Statistical adjustments effectively removed bias and extraneous variation.

Conclusions:

Modeling measurement error in recall data enhances the accuracy of long-term physical activity behavior estimates.
This approach provides a more reliable assessment of population physical activity patterns.