Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Punishment01:27

Punishment

Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity01:28

Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity

Reciprocity in attraction is fundamental to social and romantic relationships, shaping how individuals form and maintain connections. The psychological principle underlying this phenomenon is that people tend to like those who express liking toward them. Balance theory supports this tendency, suggesting that mutual attraction fosters psychological harmony, whereas one-sided affection leads to discomfort and cognitive dissonance.The Psychological Mechanisms Behind ReciprocityWhen individuals...
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
Primary and Secondary Reinforcers01:23

Primary and Secondary Reinforcers

In psychology, reinforcement is a key concept in behavior modification. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments involving rats in what is known as a Skinner box. The rats learned to press a lever to receive food, a primary reinforcer that fulfilled their innate need for nourishment.
Effective reinforcers for humans vary depending on the individual and the context. Primary reinforcers, such as food, water, sleep, shelter, and pleasure, have inherent value and satisfy basic biological...
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
Bullying02:04

Bullying

A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is bullying.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Solar geoengineering may lead to excessive cooling and high strategic uncertainty.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2020
Same author

Group size in social-ecological systems.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2018
Same author

Pro-sociality and strategic reasoning in economic decisions.

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience·2015
Same author

Money and trust among strangers.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
08:05

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

Weak reciprocity alone cannot explain peer punishment.

Marco Casari1

  • 1Department of Economics, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. marco.casari@unibo.it

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|February 1, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Empirical evidence for strong reciprocation and costly punishment in supporting cooperation requires careful interpretation. Other-regarding preferences likely influence field cooperation dynamics alongside these factors.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
08:05

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Social Psychology
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Models of strong reciprocation and costly punishment are proposed to explain cooperation.
  • Empirical support for these models, particularly in field settings, has been debated.
  • The interpretation of field evidence regarding cooperation is complex.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To qualify claims regarding the lack of empirical support for strong reciprocation.
  • To re-evaluate the empirical role of costly punishment in supporting field cooperation.
  • To explore the influence of other-regarding preferences on cooperation.

Main Methods:

  • Review and interpretation of existing field evidence on cooperation.
  • Theoretical analysis of models of strong reciprocation and costly punishment.
  • Consideration of alternative explanations for observed cooperation patterns.

Main Results:

  • Claims about the lack of empirical support for strong reciprocation need qualification.
  • The empirical role of costly punishment in field cooperation is not irrelevant but requires nuanced interpretation.
  • Field evidence suggests that other-regarding preferences significantly contribute to cooperation.

Conclusions:

  • The empirical basis for strong reciprocation and costly punishment in cooperation is more complex than often portrayed.
  • Field cooperation is likely driven by a combination of factors, including other-regarding preferences.
  • Future research should consider the multifaceted nature of cooperation in real-world settings.