Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Altruism

Altruism

Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.

Punishment

Punishment

Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.

Egoism and Altruism

Egoism and Altruism

Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”

Naturalistic Observations

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The racial and ethnic gap in behavioral measures rivals the gender gap in the United States.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Predicting norm change using threshold models.

Current opinion in psychology·2025

Same author

Higher socioeconomic status does not predict decreased prosocial behavior in a field experiment.

Nature communications·2021

Same author

Predicting social tipping and norm change in controlled experiments.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2021

Same author

Surveillance cues do not enhance altruistic behavior among anonymous strangers in the field.

PloS one·2018

Same author

Altruistic punishment does not increase with the severity of norm violations in the field.

Nature communications·2016

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

Altruistic punishment: what field data can (and cannot) demonstrate.

Nikos Nikiforakis¹

¹Department of Economics, University of Melbourne, 3010 Victoria, Australia. n.nikiforakis@unimelb.edu.au

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences

|February 1, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Altruistic punishment is crucial for cooperation, even if rare in small societies. Laboratory experiments offer valuable insights beyond limited field data, clarifying its real-world impact.

More Related Videos

Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms

Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms

Published on: November 17, 2018

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device (ALDM) Test Systems

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device (ALDM) Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms

Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms

Published on: November 17, 2018

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device (ALDM) Test Systems

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device (ALDM) Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

Area of Science:

Behavioral Economics
Social Psychology
Anthropology

Background:

Altruistic punishment, where individuals incur costs to punish non-cooperators, is theorized to promote cooperation.
Observational data from small-scale societies suggest altruistic punishment is infrequent, questioning its general importance.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the role of altruistic punishment in fostering cooperation.
To address limitations of field data by exploring experimental approaches.

Main Methods:

Review of existing literature on altruistic punishment and cooperation.
Discussion of the utility and limitations of field data collection.
Proposal for the use of laboratory experiments to study altruistic punishment in controlled settings.

Main Results:

The rarity of observed altruistic punishment in small-scale societies does not negate its significance for cooperation.
Field data, while important, possess inherent limitations in capturing the full dynamics of altruistic punishment.
Laboratory experiments provide a complementary methodology to understand the mechanisms and impact of altruistic punishment.

Conclusions:

Altruistic punishment remains a significant factor in maintaining cooperation across various social contexts.
Integrating field observations with laboratory findings offers a more comprehensive understanding of altruistic punishment.
Further research utilizing experimental paradigms is recommended to elucidate the 'in the wild' effects of altruistic punishment.