Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Disreputable science: definition and detection.

R S Morrison1

  • 1Capstone College of Nursing, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa 35487-0358.

Journal of Advanced Nursing
|August 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Early human contact and housing for pigs - part 2: resilience to routine husbandry practices.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2024
Same author

Early human contact and housing for pigs - part 3: ability to cope with the environment.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2024
Same author

Early human contact and housing for pigs - part 1: responses to humans, novelty and isolation.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2024
Same author

Group lactation from 7 or 14 days of age reduces piglet aggression at weaning compared to farrowing crate housing.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2019
Same author

Higher light intensity and mat temperature attract piglets to creep areas in farrowing pens.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2019
Same author

Forming groups of aggressive sows based on a predictive test of aggression does not affect overall sow aggression or welfare.

Behavioural processes·2018
Same journal

A Study of the Correlation Between Vulnerability to Psychological Crisis and Self-Disclosure in Elderly Patients With Multimorbidity: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

Elderspeak in Healthcare Settings: How Care, Control and Personhood Intersect in Care Communication-A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

A Model for Sustaining Second Victim Peer Support Programs in Healthcare: A Delphi Study.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

The Practice Experience of ICU Nurses in Preventing Pressure Injuries: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

Capturing the Work of Nurses in General Practice: Development and Testing of the OCEAN-GPN Tools.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
Same journal

The European Parliament's Vote on the EU Health Workforce INI Report: An EFN Commentary.

Journal of advanced nursing·2026
See all related articles

This study defines scientific fraud and misconduct, highlighting their detrimental impact on research integrity. Identifying causes and detection methods is crucial for advancing nursing as a credible science.

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Science
  • Research Integrity

Background:

  • Scientific misconduct, including fraud, undermines the credibility and progress of scientific disciplines.
  • Establishing clear definitions and recognizing hallmarks of disreputable science are vital for maintaining public trust.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define scientific fraud and misconduct within the context of disreputable science.
  • To identify common causes contributing to scientific misconduct.
  • To outline methods for detecting scientific misconduct.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and conceptual analysis of existing definitions and frameworks related to scientific misconduct.
  • Identification of key indicators and patterns associated with fraudulent or unethical research practices.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Fraud and misconduct are characterized as disreputable science, deviating from established ethical and methodological standards.
  • Specific causes, such as pressure to publish and inadequate oversight, are discussed.
  • Detection methods focus on scrutinizing data, methodology, and reporting consistency.

Conclusions:

  • Clear definitions and consistent identification of scientific misconduct are essential for nursing.
  • Implementing robust detection mechanisms will safeguard the integrity of nursing research.
  • Upholding high standards of scientific credibility is paramount for the advancement of nursing as a science.