Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The philosopher as insider and outsider.

F M Kamm1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, New York University, New York City 10003.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|August 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advanced and end of life care: cautionary suggestions.

Journal of medical ethics·2017
Same author

The morality of risks in research: reflections on Kumar.

Journal of medical ethics·2016
Same author

Moral status and personal identity: clones, embryos, and future generations.

Social philosophy & policy·2005
Same author

Embryonic stem cell research: a moral defense.

Newsletter on philosophy and medicine·2004
Same author

Cloning and harm to offspring.

New York University journal of legislation and public policy·2004
Same author

Ronald Dworkin on abortion and assisted suicide.

The journal of ethics·2003

Philosophers advising government commissions face ethical dilemmas. Whether as an insider or outsider, their role involves balancing moral considerations with practical policy-making for the public good.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Public Policy

Background:

  • Philosophers engage with government commissions on complex ethical issues.
  • The roles of insider (advisor) and outsider (commentator) present distinct challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the ethical dilemmas and duties of philosophers serving on government commissions.
  • To differentiate the responsibilities and potential impacts of insider versus outsider roles.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of philosophical roles in policy-making.
  • Examination of ethical considerations in advisory capacities.
  • Case study analysis of government reports on bioethical issues.

Main Results:

Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsPhilosophical ApproachWarnock Committee

Related Experiment Videos

  • Insider philosophers must prioritize clarity, information, and moral weight, potentially compromising document quality or direct public good promotion.
  • Outsider philosophers can offer critiques and focus on the public good, evaluating reports against ideal philosophical analysis.
  • Both roles require navigating moral compromises and the limitations of policy documents.

Conclusions:

  • Philosophers in advisory roles must balance ideal philosophical inquiry with practical policy constraints.
  • The outsider perspective offers a unique vantage point for assessing commission work and advocating for the public good.
  • Understanding these roles is crucial for effective ethical guidance in public policy.