Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Advanced and end of life care: cautionary suggestions.

Journal of medical ethics·2017

Same author

Moral status and personal identity: clones, embryos, and future generations.

Social philosophy & policy·2005

Same author

Embryonic stem cell research: a moral defense.

Newsletter on philosophy and medicine·2004

Same author

Cloning and harm to offspring.

New York University journal of legislation and public policy·2004

Same author

Ronald Dworkin on abortion and assisted suicide.

The journal of ethics·2003

Same author

Genes, justice, and obligations to future people.

Social philosophy & policy·2003

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Biobanking of Human Aqueous and Vitreous Liquid Biopsies for Molecular Analyses

Biobanking of Human Aqueous and Vitreous Liquid Biopsies for Molecular Analyses

Published on: September 11, 2023

The morality of risks in research: reflections on Kumar.

Journal of Medical Ethics

|September 21, 2016

Summary

This paper examines research risks, including ethical dilemmas like using people as mere means and issues of aggregation. It explores contractualism, uncertainty, and the complexities of paternalism and complicity in research.

Area of Science:

Bioethics
Research Ethics
Philosophy of Science

Background:

Ethical considerations are paramount in scientific research.
Understanding and mitigating research risks is crucial for responsible innovation.
Existing frameworks may not fully address novel ethical challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically analyze various ethical risks encountered in research.
To explore the implications of treating research participants as mere means.
To examine the role of aggregation, contractualism, uncertainty, paternalism, and complicity in research ethics.

Main Methods:

Philosophical analysis of ethical concepts.
Conceptual exploration of research-related risks.
Literature review of ethical theories and their application to research.

Keywords:

More Related Videos

Visualizing the Gatekeeper: Evan's Blue Dye-Based Assessment of Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability in Adult Zebrafish

Visualizing the Gatekeeper: Evan's Blue Dye-Based Assessment of Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability in Adult Zebrafish

Published on: September 30, 2025

Pooled shRNA Library Screening to Identify Factors that Modulate a Drug Resistance Phenotype

Pooled shRNA Library Screening to Identify Factors that Modulate a Drug Resistance Phenotype

Published on: June 17, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Biobanking of Human Aqueous and Vitreous Liquid Biopsies for Molecular Analyses

Biobanking of Human Aqueous and Vitreous Liquid Biopsies for Molecular Analyses

Published on: September 11, 2023

Visualizing the Gatekeeper: Evan's Blue Dye-Based Assessment of Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability in Adult Zebrafish

Visualizing the Gatekeeper: Evan's Blue Dye-Based Assessment of Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability in Adult Zebrafish

Published on: September 30, 2025

Pooled shRNA Library Screening to Identify Factors that Modulate a Drug Resistance Phenotype

Pooled shRNA Library Screening to Identify Factors that Modulate a Drug Resistance Phenotype

Published on: June 17, 2022

Main Results:

Identified treating individuals as mere means as a significant ethical risk.
Highlighted challenges in aggregating harms and benefits in research.
Discussed diverse interpretations of contractualism and their relevance.
Examined the impact of uncertainty on ethical decision-making.
Analyzed the ethical nuances of paternalism and complicity.

Conclusions:

A comprehensive ethical framework is needed to address multifaceted research risks.
Further discourse on contractualism and its application to research is warranted.
Ethical vigilance regarding paternalism and complicity is essential for participant protection.