Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predicting errors before they occur using trial-by-trial dynamics of pre-error and post-error behavior.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Repeated exposure to task-relevant and task-irrelevant information - and their interaction - affect visual search performance.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence and computer-aided diagnosis in diagnostic decisions: 5 questions for medical informatics and human-computer interface research.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2025
Same author

Using the cognitive rigidity-flexibility dimension to deepen our understanding of the autism spectrum.

Personality neuroscience·2025
Same author

Standard experimental paradigm designs and data exclusion practices in cognitive psychology can inadvertently introduce systematic "shadow" biases in participant samples.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2023
Same author

Characterizing motion prediction in small autonomous swarms.

Applied ergonomics·2022
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The frustration of a small <i>n</i>.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Why do we have two eyes.

Perception·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Distractor filtering in media multitaskers.

Matthew S Cain1, Stephen R Mitroff

  • 1Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA. matthew.s.cain@duke.edu

Perception
|February 8, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Heavy media multitaskers (HMMs) struggle with irrelevant information due to attentional differences, not memory deficits. This study shows HMMs fail to use top-down control to filter distractions, unlike light media multitaskers (LMMs).

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Media Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Modern media consumption involves simultaneous engagement, termed media multitasking.
  • Heavy media multitaskers (HMMs) are more susceptible to irrelevant information intrusions than light media multitaskers (LMMs).
  • Previous research has not definitively identified whether deficits in HMMs stem from memory or attentional limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the specific locus of cognitive deficits in heavy media multitaskers.
  • To differentiate between attentional and memory-based explanations for impaired performance in HMMs.
  • To determine if HMMs exhibit differences in attentional control compared to LMMs.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a singleton distractor task with minimal working-memory demands to isolate attentional processes.
  • Compared the performance of heavy media multitaskers (HMMs) and light media multitaskers (LMMs) on this task.
  • Assessed the ability of participants to use top-down information to modulate attentional capture.

Main Results:

  • Light media multitaskers (LMMs) effectively employed top-down control to enhance performance on the attentional task.
  • Heavy media multitaskers (HMMs) did not show similar improvements, indicating a deficit in top-down attentional regulation.
  • Performance differences suggest HMMs may maintain a broader attentional scope, even when not beneficial.

Conclusions:

  • The findings provide evidence for attentional differences in heavy media multitaskers (HMMs).
  • The results support the hypothesis that HMMs exhibit a wider attentional scope than LMMs.
  • Deficits in HMMs appear to be rooted in attentional control rather than solely memory limitations.