Purkinje cell simple spike activity during grasping and lifting objects of different textures and weights

1. Three monkeys (2.5-3.5 kg) were trained to pinch an object between the thumb and forefinger and to lift it a vertical distance of 1.0-2.0 cm. Either the object weight (15, 65, or 115 g) or the surface texture (sand paper or polished metal) contacting the fingers could be varied. The object was equipped with a vertical position transducer, an accelerometer, and strain gauges that measured the grip force and the vertical load force. 2. In accordance with similar previously published studies on human subjects, it was found that monkeys appropriately scaled the grip forces according to the weight and coefficient of friction of the object. The grip force preceded the load force by 25 ms, and they both covaried with the changes in surface friction. 3. An analysis of electromyograms (EMGs) recorded intramuscularly from the muscles of the wrist and fingers including both flexors and extensors indicated that 26 muscles were active during pinching and lifting. Of these, 17 produced the maximum activity for the slippery surface and the greatest weight and the least activity with the roughest surface and lightest weight. 4. A total of 59 Purkinje cells and 123 unidentified units recorded from the paravermal and lateral cerebellar cortex were found to change their firing frequency during lifting the experimental object. 5. Increased discharge during the grasping and lifting was found for 56% (33/59) of the Purkinje cells and 80% (98/123) of the unidentified neurons, whereas 44% (26/59) of the Purkinje cells and 20% of the unidentified neurons decreased activity during the same period. 6. Significant modulations of the firing frequency with surface texture or object weight occurred for 59% (35/59) of the Purkinje cells and 67% (82/123) of the unidentified neurons. 7. One hundred and three Purkinje and unidentified neurons recorded in the paravermal and lateral region of the cerebellar cortex were examined for peripheral receptive fields, and of these, 43/103 (42%) responded exclusively to imposed displacements and tapping of muscles suggesting afferents originating from proprioceptors. A further 28/103 (27%) had exclusively cutaneous receptive fields on the hand that could be stimulated by brushing the skin lightly with a sable hair brush. Only six neurons demonstrated convergent cutaneous and proprioceptive receptive fields and no response to peripheral stimulation could be found for 26 neurons. No difference was found between the receptive fields of Purkinje cells and those of the unidentified neurons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)