Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Expert testimony based on decision analysis: a malpractice case report.

S S Weir1, P Curtis, R A McNutt

  • 1Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599.

Journal of General Internal Medicine
|September 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Migrant children within Europe: a systematic review of children's perspectives on their health experiences.

Public health·2018
Same author

Increased risk of influenza among vaccinated adults who are obese.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2017
Same author

High HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men in Jamaica is associated with social vulnerability and other sexually transmitted infections.

The West Indian medical journal·2014
Same author

Original research : after-hours calls: a forgotten item of education in family practice.

Medical teacher·2014
Same author

Oxytocin and the augmentation of labor : Human and medical perspectives.

Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.)·2013
Same author

Jordanian perspectives on advanced nursing practice: an ethnography.

International nursing review·2012
Same journal

Impact of Health Insurance Coverage on Diabetes Care Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in U.S. Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Assessment of Physician Advocacy Engagement: A Scoping Review and Proposal of an Assessment Tool.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Relative Burden of Social Determinants of Health on Diverse Populations of Health Resources and Services Administration Health Centers.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Addressing Moral Distress Among Gender-Affirming Healthcare Professionals.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Trainee-Led Patient Education to Increase Advance Care Planning in a Geriatric Primary Care Clinic.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Scholarly Outcomes of a Small Projects Grant Program.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
See all related articles

Decision analysis offers an objective method for expert testimony in medical malpractice cases. This approach can improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce bias in legal proceedings.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Malpractice Law
  • Decision Analysis in Medicine
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Expert testimony in malpractice cases often lacks objectivity.
  • Subjectivity in expert opinions can lead to biased legal outcomes.
  • Decision-analytic techniques offer a potential for objective evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the utility of decision-analytic techniques in providing objective expert testimony.
  • To compare decision analysis with traditional expert witness opinions in a malpractice case.
  • To assess the potential of quantitative methods to improve the reliability of expert testimony.

Main Methods:

  • A case report involving a patient with chest pain and a malpractice suit for delayed diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized decision tree and threshold analysis to determine optimal diagnostic and treatment thresholds.
  • Compared expert witness testimony on the standard of care with decision analysis outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • Decision analysis indicated that cardiac catheterization was a more appropriate diagnostic test than exercise stress testing.
    • The quantitative analysis provided a basis for evaluating the expert testimony regarding the standard of care.
    • Highlighted discrepancies between subjective expert opinions and objective analytical results.

    Conclusions:

    • Decision-analytic techniques provide a structured, quantitative framework for expert judgment.
    • These methods can help mitigate the subjectivity and bias inherent in traditional expert testimony.
    • Implementing decision analysis may enhance the objectivity and reliability of expert evidence in malpractice litigation.