Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Drug Discovery: Overview

Drug Discovery: Overview

Drug discovery is a multifaceted process involving extensive screening, testing, and optimization of lead compounds to identify potential new drugs for therapeutic use. It combines several approaches, including screening large numbers of natural products, chemical modification of known active molecules, identification of new drug targets, and rational design based on biological mechanisms and drug-receptor structure. These approaches are carried out in both academic research laboratories and...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures

Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures

All the digits in a measurement, including the uncertain last digit, are called significant figures or significant digits. Note that zero may be a measured value; for example, if a scale that shows weight to the nearest pound reads “140,” then the 1 (hundreds), 4 (tens), and 0 (ones) are all significant (measured) values.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks.

Science advances·2015

Same author

Leadership Insularity: A New Measure of Connectivity Between Central Nodes in Networks.

Connections (Toronto, Ont.)·2014

Same author

Contagion of Cooperation in Static and Fluid Social Networks.

PloS one·2013

Same author

Scaling of Prosocial Behavior in Cities.

Physica A·2012

Same author

Egocentric social network structure, health, and pro-social behaviors in a national panel study of Americans.

PloS one·2012

Same author

Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2011

Same journal

Ordering matters in shared authorship: a response to Decius and Schilbach.

Scientometrics·2026

Same journal

Divided by discipline? A systematic literature review on the quantification of online sexism and misogyny using a semi-automated approach.

Scientometrics·2025

Same journal

Science diplomacy: A global research field? Findings from a bibliometric analysis of the science diplomacy scholarship of the past twenty years.

Scientometrics·2025

Same journal

Are questionable research practices considered a successful career strategy? A novel implementation of the implicit association test.

Scientometrics·2025

Same journal

The underexplored effects of economic transition on intellectual property rights protection: An economic geography perspective.

Scientometrics·2025

Same journal

Towards multiple ontologies in science mapping. A tribute to Loet Leydesdorff.

Scientometrics·2025

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

Automating Aggregate Quantification in Caenorhabditis elegans

Automating Aggregate Quantification in Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: October 14, 2021

Quantifying the Ease of Scientific Discovery.

Samuel Arbesman¹

¹Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA USA 617-432-7421.

|February 14, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Scientific discovery

More Related Videos

Experimental Quantification of Interactions Between Drug Delivery Systems and Cells In Vitro: A Guide for Preclinical Nanomedicine Evaluation

Experimental Quantification of Interactions Between Drug Delivery Systems and Cells In Vitro: A Guide for Preclinical Nanomedicine Evaluation

Published on: September 28, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Automating Aggregate Quantification in Caenorhabditis elegans

Automating Aggregate Quantification in Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: October 14, 2021

Experimental Quantification of Interactions Between Drug Delivery Systems and Cells In Vitro: A Guide for Preclinical Nanomedicine Evaluation

Experimental Quantification of Interactions Between Drug Delivery Systems and Cells In Vitro: A Guide for Preclinical Nanomedicine Evaluation

Published on: September 28, 2022

Area of Science:

This study spans multiple scientific disciplines, including biology, chemistry, and astronomy.
It examines the quantitative aspects of scientific progress and discovery.
Focuses on the patterns of scientific output and the ease of making new discoveries.

Background:

Scientific output has historically followed a logistic growth curve, indicating increasing productivity over time.
The functional form of scientific growth has been attributed to various changes in scientific processes.
Understanding the interplay between research effort and discovery is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce a quantitative method for assessing the ease of scientific progress.
To analyze the factors influencing the pace of scientific discovery.
To provide insights into the future of scientific discoveries and methodologies.

Main Methods:

Developed a quantitative method to measure the ease of scientific discovery.
Analyzed data from three distinct scientific fields: mammalian species, chemical elements, and minor planets.
Modeled the pace of discovery as a function of scientific output and ease of discovery.

Main Results:

The ease of scientific discovery was found to follow an exponential decay pattern across disciplines.
Demonstrated that the pace of discovery is a product of both scientific output and ease of discovery.
Provided a quantitative framework for understanding the dynamics of scientific progress.

Conclusions:

The ease of discovery diminishes exponentially over time, suggesting increasing difficulty in finding new knowledge.
The pace of scientific advancement is determined by the combined effects of cumulative knowledge and the diminishing ease of new discoveries.
This quantitative approach offers valuable insights into the future trajectory and underlying mechanisms of scientific discovery.